Last week I went to a local pick-your-own farm to get late harvest vegetables. The owners have managed to make their agricultural home quite an attraction, which is mobbed on the weekends, by fostering lots of adorable animals for the kids to feed and pet, as well as a corn maze, and a mountainous pile of hay bales to climb.
Of course, while I was there I had to record the condition of the trees, which as will be seen, were abjectly thin, on October 15.
The cows and pigs munch and root, as oblivious as are 99% of humans to the harbingers of ecosystem collapse plainly visible around them.
There are quite a few playful goats, who regularly escape the confines of the pasture and wander into places they shouldn't be.
On another topic, much to my delight, Dr. Paul Rogers of Utah State University has responded to my questions about Sudden Aspen Death and the potential role of atmospheric pollution by kindly sending me so many links to such valuable research that my head is spinning!
Here is one for the lichen skeptics:
Since the effects of air pollutants on trees can be difficult to separate from other influences on growth (such as soil variations), epiphytic lichens provide a clear indication of potential air quality impacts on total forest productivity.
Along those lines, let's consider a random, typical lilac which I photographed today, October 19. It should have all of its leaves intact, since we have yet to experience frost. But actually, the leaves have been falling since midsummer, it has been getting thinner and thinner, and here is what the remaining leaves look like, perfect examples of atmospheric poisoning.
And now let us look at the branches, swarming with lichens, not one variety but at least two and maybe more!
The hairy type I first saw on vacation in Newport last summer, and again on Cape Cod. This is the first time I have seen it in New Jersey. Um seriously, can anyone really claim that a branch so sodden with a growth that also likes to live on rocks can possibly be anything other than DEAD?
Now - some anomalous behavior, which I can't exactly explain, not being a botanist, will follow. Although I do know, it's not normal:
This flaming bush hedge looks as though it might be turning into that intense scarlet, until under closer examination, it is apparent the leaves are turning brown faster than red.
The delphinium finally bloomed. I cannot explain why so late or why they are a dismal shadow of what the glorious blossoms were last year, when each strand was at least a foot or more high, and now none are even six inches.
And this is just bizarre. Quite a few trees have been displaying this type of growth, where the earlier foliage from spring is turning fall color, and more recent, spindly growth sprouts are still green. I don't know if this is the tree's response to overall decline, a frantic late growth spurt - or if perhaps it is directly related to the fluctuating concentrations of toxic greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere.
Another link I discovered thanks to Dr. Rogers is this page from the US Forest Service Ozone Biomonitoring Program, which has over 1300 stations in 45 states!
Where the following is to be found:
The airborne transport of O3 to remote forested areas has led to increasing concern about how this pollutant is influencing the health of individual trees and forest ecosystems. In the United States, periods of high ozone concentration coincide with the growing season when plants are most vulnerable to injury. Possible impacts of ozone on forest species include reduced growth and vigor, reduced seed production, and increased susceptibility to insects and disease...
When ozone contaminates the environment, the bioindicator plant shows a visible response usually described asupper-leaf-surface ozone stipple for broad leaf plants, and chlorotic mottle for pine species. A useful bioindicator plant may be a tree, a woody shrub, or a non-woody herb species. The essential characteristic is that the species respond to ambient levels of ozone pollution with distinct visible foliar symptoms that are easy to diagnose.
Here is a movie from the National Park Service about air quality.
I have joined up at tcktcktck, which at the moment has on the home page a sob-inducing video of children who are going to inherit the hideous mess their parents have made of the planet.
Somehow I missed the Oct. 15 Blog Action Day, but I expect to be perusing their list of 13,323 bloggers, and counting, who signed up to participate in their annual social action event to address climate change. Almost 18 million readers across the globe clicked on the posts, including one from the White House, to raise awareness. Not too shabby! Now we only need 5 billion or so more to wake up, especially the ones who control our governments (that would be the corporations) and will be deciding our fate in Copenhagen in December.
For a perversely dire but optimistic planetary prognosis, here is a nice example.
That's all, for now.
"... epiphytic lichens provide a clear indication of potential air quality impacts on total forest productivity."ReplyDelete
Gail, you got that reference from
> Dr. Paul Rogers of Utah State University
Please follow up -- ask Dr. Rogers to look at what you concluded from reading the reference he sent you.
I think you have read it wrong, and that lichens are sensitive to air pollution and die back fast in polluted air.
Yes, lichen and fungi and much else will grow more thickly on dead wood. That's evidence of dead wood and clean air.
But I'm just some guy on a blog.
Please, ask Dr. Rogers to come read and comment on what you've posted after reading his suggestions.
Please ask him to look at what you wrote above and tell you if you have understood how lichen
Hank Roberts, this is the first message Dr. Rogers sent me:ReplyDelete
Dear Gail Zawacki, I have attached two research papers addressing lichen communities in aspen and aspen-associate tree species in our area. In terms of lichens, generally, there are species which proliferate in polluted environs and those that die-off. The "gray-green" species you are seeing in your area is likely (though I am not familiar with your proximity to urban pollution sources) one which has a high tollerance for nitrogen, sulfur, or related air borne substances (i.e., ammonia/ammonium). As you are probably already aware, lichens are very good indicators of air quality and this science has been around for at least 100 years (especially in Europe). A good source for finding more information on lichens as bioindicators is: http://fia.fs.fed.us/lichen/
I send him a link to this post already, since his name is in it.
This may be closer to home:ReplyDelete
Friday, August 7, 2009
PS 95-189: Lichen distribution across a landscape gradient as an indicator of air pollution and habitat alteration
Bryan E. Dolney, Matthew R. Opdyke, and Laura Frost. Point Park University
Epiphytic lichen communities are well established indicators of urban air pollution and habitat alteration. In regions experiencing urban development, a long-term decline in species diversity of epiphytic lichen, particularly species sensitive to sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter, may be linked to increasing transportation and industry. To investigate the application of epiphytic lichens as indicators of air pollution and habitat alteration in southwestern Pennsylvania, USA, we measured species diversity and lichen health along a landscape gradient, which included 12 plots within multiple urban sites in the City of Pittsburgh and 12 plots within two rural sites outside of downtown Pittsburgh’s airshed. Additionally, we transplanted lichens from rural sites to locations with contrasting air quality to evaluate differences in biomass growth rates across the landscape gradient. To further examine the impact of microhabitat on lichen health, bark pH was measured at all plots and compared to the health of epiphytic lichens. Tree bark provides the substrate for epiphytic lichen species, in addition to being a simple and sensitive indicator of air pollution.
We found that urban and rural regions show contrasting communities of epiphytic lichen corresponding to air pollution and habitat alteration. More than twenty lichen species were identified among all sample plots, with the most common species being Flavoparmelia caperata and Parmelia squarrosa. Anaptychia palmulata and Parmelia squarrosa, two sensitive species to air pollution, were more robust and abundant at rural sites. Early results suggest that species richness of lichens can be used as an indicator of air quality. We also found that the distribution of lichens within any given wooded park is affected by habitat structure, such as canopy cover and moisture content. Lichens contribute to biodiversity, so that tracking changes in these communities can be an early indicator of more serious changes across the larger ecosystem.