Tuesday, July 16, 2013

A Walk in the Park In the Land of the Bitterz

“Man in his misguidance has powerfully interfered with nature. He has devastated the forests, and thereby even changed the atmospheric conditions and the climate. Some species of plants and animals have become entirely extinct through man, although they were essential in the economy of Nature. Everywhere the purity of the air is affected by smoke and the like, and the rivers are defiled. These and other things are serious encroachments upon Nature, which men nowadays entirely overlook but which are of the greatest importance, and at once show their evil effect not only upon plants but upon animals as well, the latter not having the endurance and power of resistance of man.”

~ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 1832
Middle daughter Dr. Sophie now has a real job as a veterinary surgeon (yes, I'm proud of her!) in Pennsylvania yay! - much closer than her externship at the horse clinic in Kentucky.  I stayed at her new house to help her move in and unpack, with much muscled help from her housemate, Dr. Kurt.
His dog Sparky knows he's not supposed to be on the sofa, but whatever.
There is a deep, narrow backyard, a territory dominated by a incessantly vocal catbird.
A news story proclaims:  Across tobacco country, crops wilt from rain
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) -- Jason Elliott had one of his best stands of burley tobacco growing until the rains started. Five days and seven inches of precipitation later, about a quarter of his crop was ruined, trimming thousands of dollars from his payday when he hauls his leaf to market in a few months. 
Fields all over tobacco country have been soaked, and without a good stretch of dry weather in coming weeks, Elliott's predicament could play out many times over. In Kentucky alone, the nation's second-leading producer, the toll could hit as much as $100 million if the crop doesn't rebound. More than half of top grower North Carolina's crop is in jeopardy. 
"It's just got a real pale color to it," Elliott said. "It doesn't have the good green tobacco color that it should have." 
"This is the most widespread and significant amount of damage I've seen from a single event like this," Pearce said. "The number of (damage) reports that I'm getting is kind of unprecedented. It's been a game-changer."
Here's the photo that accompanied the article:
Is that all water damage?  Curious...because tobacco is one of the first crops ever to lead to assessments of air pollution, going wayyyy back at least to a paper published in 1964 by Saul Rich of the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, Ozone Damage to Plants, in the Annual Review of Phytopathology.  The full article is behind a paywall but when googled it includes this passage:

"...apparent in 1959, when ozone was reported to cause tobacco fleck (21). In the same year, Daines et al. (22) noted ozone damage on many crops in New Jersey ..."

At the link I can read a bit of it, but not copy and paste because it's so old - but I've retyped the beginning because it is so terrific:

"Fly the rank city, shun its turbid air; Breathe not the chaos of external smoke and volatile corruption."  Thus advised Dr. Cornelius B. Fox in the verse he chose to grace the title page of his book Ozone and Autozone published in 1873.  He could not foresee that 90 years later we would be concerned with the "volatile corruption" that follows city dwellers in the efforts to "fly the city".

"It is just within the last 15 years that we have begun to recognize the damage to our crops inflicted by photochemical phytotoxicants produced in the polluted atmospheres of an oil-fueled megalopolis.  The two most important photochemical phytotoxicants that concern us are ozone and peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN).  Until recently our attention has been centered on PAN.  Now, however, we are becoming increasingly aware of the extent of plant damage caused by ozone."

Research about the effects of ozone on plants has continued around the world since then, frequently on tobacco.  Naturally, companies like R.J. Reynolds are concerned about this!  The photos above and below are from their archives and have the following caption:

Host: burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum (burley type) L.)
Descriptor: Damage
Description: Exposure to high levels of atmospheric pollutants such as ozone may cause tobacco leaves to develop small dark green water-soaked spots. Within 48 hours, the lesions change to a brown color then to grey or white and appear as sunken necrotic areas bordered by chlorotic tissue. Lower leaf surfaces may show no evidence of damage in the early stages. Symptoms may occur at any stage of growth, but most commonly occur during periods of rapid growth. Older leaves are more susceptible. Lesions may coalesce causing the lamina to become necrotic and fall out.
Image type: Field 
Image location: United States 

Photographer Information
I'm including a few more links about tobacco and ozone - but scroll past them if they're boring!  Following is an abstract from F.D.H. Macdowall published in the Canadian Journal of Plant Science, in 1965:

PREDISPOSITION OF TOBACCO TO OZONE DAMAGE

"Effects of ontogeny, genome, nitrogen, and water supplies and ozone itself in predisposing tobacco plants to ozone damage (including weather fleck) are described from experiments in both field and greenhouse. The fully expanded leaf became susceptible to low doses of ozone at the time its protein content started to fall. Topping slowed the development of susceptibility of leaves, with the result that the susceptibility of the plants was decreased. Effects of genome were at least partly of an ontogenetic nature. Susceptibility was enhanced by both deficiency and excess of nitrogen. Moisture prior to fumigation increased susceptibility. Long term effects of moisture supply were akin to its influence on drought-hardiness. Susceptibility was increased by shortened photoperiod."
 This pair of photos comes from the Texas A&M Agricultural Extension webpage, with the caption:

Symptoms:  Ozone injury appears first on older leaves. Affected leaves appear silvery to whitish. Bleaching will eventually kill the leaves in most severe cases. Watermelon appears to be fairly sensitive to ozone.

Control:  There are no known cultural controls for ozone injury. Grow crops away from heavily polluted areas.


In 1979, research using tobacco in controlled ozone fumigation experiments in Israel was published in the International Journal of Biometeorology.  Here's the abstract:

"Bel-W3 Tobacco, which is highly sensitive to ozone, was grown in two glass chambers and exposed to the ambient air at the periphery of Tel-Aviv, during winter, spring, summer and autumn 1978. During the exposure time, atmospheric ozone was continuously measured by a chemiluminescent monitor. Throughout the experiments, plants' height was measured and the number of leaves was determined three times weekly. The extent of injury to the tobacco plants was measured by the percentage of injured plants, the percentage of injured leaves and the percentage of leaves' area injured. Necrotic lesions, typical for ozone injury, appeared on the mature leaves of the exposed tobacco plants in three out of four exposures. Appearance of incipient injury differed among the experiments and depended not only on exposure duration and on ozone concentrations, but also on the exposure conditions (like light intensity, temperature and humidity), which considerably influenced the appearance of the injury. The percentage of injured leaves and the percentage of leaves' area injured, increased with the duration of exposure and with rising cumulative ozone concentrations."

The Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications, CREAF, located in Spain, had this to say about ozone:

"Biomarkers of pollution
Despite the efforts made during the last decade to reduce pollutant emissions, the pollution remains one of the most serious environmental problems. In the past few years, the use of biomonitors as tools for evaluating air pollution, and to estimate the concentration of the pollutant can also help to assess the effects on human beings.  Most vegetables are potential indicators of the environmental quality of the environment where they live, but some species, given their sensitivity to variations and disturbances of certain substances or their ability to receive and accumulation are biomonitors."
"CREAF evaluates the presence and amount of various pollutants from observation and measurement of specific symptoms produced in plants as a result of exposure to pollution, and the measurement of pollutant concentrations in the leaves.  Among the plant species indicators that are used to assess contamination include: the tobacco plant ( Nicotiana tabacum cvs. Bel-W3 and Bel-B), the green bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), clover ( Trifolium repens clones R and S) and poplar (Populus nigra cv. Brandaris ) as indicators of the presence of ozone."

Remember when Obama got in so much trouble during his first campaign for saying people in Pennsylvania the people cling to their guns and religion out of bitterness?
GAWD they cling to their machines too!  The houses in Sophie's neighborhood are old - hers is 18th century - so it looks quiet and sleepy.  But there's actually an inordinate number of recklessly speeding vehicles and noise from power equipment, which I hate.  Well, and the trees are dying.
The little tree below has had all it's branches chopped off to encourage new growth.
It was stifling, sweltering hot and I went to sit on the front porch step for a rest, but the racket from mowers and hedge trimmers and even a ride-on vacuum - yes, to clean the sidewalk and curb!! - was deafening.  Oops that little tree behind the one that was amputated was completely whacked.
The motorized equipment seems crazy because the lawns are so tiny they could be easily tended with push-mowers and rakes...the sidewalk could be swept with a broom and the hedges trimmed with clippers.
All that machinery was so loud I nearly was run over in the street while unloading the car, because I couldn't hear an SUV coming up behind me.  Rather than slowing down (???) the driver just blasted his horn.
When things were calmer I decided to explore down this little alley across the street.
It runs inbetween the backyards of two rows of houses, where there were lots of parked cars and dying - or dead - trees.  Isn't it adorable how these little concrete animals decorate this stump, wide enough for a whole menagerie?  It's so large I imagine quite a few real creatures lost their home, permanently, when it was taken down.
It's impossible to imagine how this neighborhood must have been so much cooler and more lovely when the old trees provided shade.  This giant with it's head lopped off perplexed me.
It had some poison ivy growing up the trunk, exhibiting what I call the albino leaf that I see on all sorts of plants this summer.
I wasn't sure what kind of tree it was although I suspected a mulberry.  At the house in Ipswich where I grew up, we had an old mulberry which had been planted in a prior century by a former occupant, who was a nurseryman.  There was nothing left of his business but a broken-down greenhouse foundation littered with countless shards of shattered glass, a yellowed ledger found in the attic filled with spidery script notations of ancient transactions - and the mulberry.  When I got home I searched online and found a paper on mulberries written by Dr. Sally Weeks, a dendrologist at Purdue.  Here's what the paper says: 

"White mulberry is native to China. For thousands of years, it was cultivated as the preferred food source for the silk worm. The art of silk-making spread to Japan, then to India, and eventually into Europe."
"Although earlier attempts to establish mulberry in the New World failed, it was introduced in the Long Island area in 1827, being touted by European sericulturists as the basis of a great commercial enterprise. Word spread quickly and mulberry was eagerly planted throughout the eastern United States."
Above is a photo from her paper.  I still wasn't quite convinced that the tree I saw was indeed a mulberry, because the leaves weren't quite the same - so I wrote her:

Dear Dr. Weeks,

I found your guide to mulberries online and wondered if you could help me identify this attached tree.  The leaves look quite like white mulberry but not exactly.  If it's not mulberry do you know what it is?

Thanks so much, I appreciate any help!

Gail Zawacki
She wrote right back!  With some very interesting comments:

Hi Gail,
You are correct - it is Morus alba. Hormones make trees do funky things sometimes, and the cutting of the tree has created a flush of new, vigorous growth. You really never know what shape the mulberry's leaves will be on such growth (kind of like acne on young adults - hormones can cause such things). Sassafras, as well as several other tree species, do the same.  
Thanks for the email from so far away :-)
Sally

Sally S. Weeks
Dendrologist
Dept. Forestry and Natural Resources
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN 47907

This is an intriguing point about hormones stimulating new growth, which I already knew, but making leaves different shapes is something I didn't know.  The story of the silk worm industry is also critical because so many foresters make the case that invasive species are the reason trees are dying abruptly, from alien insects, disease and fungus brought in on imported nursery stock.  I keep making the point here on Wit's End that nursery stock has been traded internationally for decades if not centuries, and here the mulberry is quite an example.  I simply couldn't resist taking a picture of the decoration on the truck parked next to it:
The title for this post is "A Walk in the Park In the Land of the Bitterz" because one afternoon I went to a really large preserve near Sophie's house, called Tyler Arboretum.  Sophie wanted me to fill her pots with heirloom tomatoes, herbs and flowers, so I accidentally found the park while looking on a map for a Lowe's, to get soil.  What a discovery!  It has 20 miles of trails on 650 acres but even more importantly, it's very, very old.  The planting of imported trees began in the 1820's, meaning they, too silently attest that whatever is killing trees, alien species can hardly account for it.
The property runs well off this section of their map and of this, I barely went much past the stream that feeds the pond.  That central area is where the largest, oldest trees are, and I took many pictures of them in between hiding from the intermittant rain.  The brochure says that of the original 1,100 specimens planted between 1825 and 1876, 20 survive, in addition to five other native from the same era or possibly earlier.  Their website still says that 26 survive, so obviously the number is dropping and in fact when I was paying the admittance fee, the helpful clerk took a pen and X-d out two more that fell.  One, she said, was the River Birch taken out by a storm and the other, a Sugar Maple, from "old, old age".  Of course, since the Sugar Maple was one of those first planted, that means it could have been at most 188 years old which is not "OLD, OLD" for a tree that can live to be 300 to 400 years old if left undisturbed, thank you very much.
The rest of this post consists of photos of the trees, at a distance and then close-ups of the leaves or bark.  It's an incredibly important exercise, because every single one of them, whether old or young, tree or shrub or even groundcover, exhibits injured foliage as of the beginning of July.  The damage ranges the full gamut - spotting, chlorotic yellowing, necrosis, and leaf and needle drop.  Whether you want to blame drought or climate change or invasives or pollution, this indicates a very serious trend.
Even before I went into the gift shop to buy my ticket, I could see in the parking lot that the "evergreen" shrubs were in very bad condition.
Some of them had barely any leaves left at all, and those that remained were spotted.
Some of them look burnt.
The trees are broken and thin.
Even the potted nasturtiums in the windowbox are unhealthy.
Following are some excerpts from the Arboretum website, about the history of the farm:
“There is something noble and pure in a taste for the beauty of vegetation. Thee who plants a tree plats for posterity and he who exalts it will continue to flourish long after he shall cease to enjoy his paternal fields. Let us cherish the groves that surround our ancestral mansion – look back with proud recollection and forward with honorable anticipation.”  ~ Minshall Painter
"Starting in 1825 and continuing until 1876, Minshall and Jacob Painter, began collecting and planting trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants in the valley directly behind their home and farm buildings. Their collection of plants grew to more than 1,100 specimens, planted in tidy rows that radiated out from the farmhouse. The one exception was the giant sequoia, located on the crest of the hill adjacent to Painter Road. Today, over 20 of these Painter Plants are alive, some of which are state champions. Additionally, five native trees from the Painter brothers’ era or earlier survive."
"In 1681 Thomas Minshall, an English Quaker, purchased property in Pennsylvania from William Penn that contained the site now occupied by the Arboretum. Between 1681 and 1944, the property was owned by eight generations of the same Minshall/Painter/Tyler family. Until 1944, it was a working farm and served as a summer residence for the Tyler family."
"The Arboretum itself began as the private collection of two brothers, Jacob and Minshall Painter. The brothers were fascinated by the popular 19th century study of natural history. During their lifetimes, they managed to amass large collections of dried plants, rocks, and other specimens. In 1825, the brothers set aside some of their land to begin the systematic planting of more than 1,000 varieties of trees and shrubs."
"In 1944, Laura Tyler, a direct descendant of Thomas Minshall, bequeathed the property to a board of Trustees that had been established to direct and oversee the land as an arboretum. Dr. John Casper Wister, Tyler Arboretum’s first director, was considered by many to be one of the great American horticultural figures of the 20th century. He set out to build upon the Painter legacy, whereupon he created comprehensive collections representing conifers, magnolias, lilacs, hollies, narcissus, peonies and rhododendrons."
"The primary industry in the early years of the property was the growing and harvesting of grains. Cows and pigs were raised primarily to serve the family. Enos Painter (Minshall and Jacob Painter’s father) decided to shift the farm’s production to beef and dairy cattle. To house his livestock, Enos began construction in 1833 of a massive, three-story addition to the western end of the existing barn. Built into a south-facing slope, this bank barn is believed to be one of the largest remaining in the Delaware Valley.  The first floor sheltered animals; the second and third floors provided storage for hay and grain to feed them."
I read a terrific article at the UK Guardian, which I'm going to copy below.  Apparently, the robots HAVE ALREADY taken over the world, we just haven't noticed, because they have cleverly mesmerized us with technological wizardry.  It explains a lot:
How technology has stopped evolution and is destroying the world;  Doug Tompkins, founder of The North Face, on battles with Steve Jobs and why we need to dismantle our techno-industrial society.
It has become something of a mantra within the sustainability movement that innovations in technology can save the world. But rather than liberating us, Doug Tompkins, the cofounder of retail brands The North Face and Esprit, believes technology has enslaved us and is destroying the very health of the planet on which all species depend.
Tompkins, 70 has used his enormous wealth from selling both companies to preserve more land than any other individual in history, spending more than £200m buying over two million acres of wilderness in Argentina and Chile.
He challenges the view that technology is extending democracy, arguing that it is concentrating even more power in the hands of a tiny elite. What troubles him the most is that the very social and environmental movements that should be challenging the destructive nature of mega-technologies, have instead fallen under their spell.
"We have been poor on doing the systemic analysis and especially in the area of technology criticism," says Tompkins, who has been deeply influenced by former Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess, who called for a dismantling of the techno-industrial society.
"Until we get better at that, I think we're cooked, we're going to continue to extinct species and we're going to continue to dig the hole deeper of the whole eco-social crisis.
"If you just hold your cell phone for 30 seconds and think backwards through its production you have the entire techno-industrial culture wrapped up there. You can't have that device without everything that goes with it. You see mining, transportation, manufacturing, computers, high-speed communications, satellite communications, it's all there, you see and it's that techno-industrial culture that's destroying the world."
Championing the environment
Tompkins is considered a hero in the deep ecology movement and works hand in hand with his wife Kris, the former CEO of the outdoor clothing and equipment company Patagonia.
Amelanchier Canadensis
They have been instrumental in creating two huge nature reserves and are in the process of creating another one in the South American region of Patagonia, despite opposition within Latin America, including being accused by rightwing Chilean politicians of effectively splitting the country in two in a conspiratorial land grab.
Too many standing dead trees to keep up with removal!
Together, they also fund numerous small activist NGOs, arguing that more established organisations such as WWF and Greenpeace have become too closely enmeshed with corporations.
Bark falling off Cedrus atlantica
"When WWF started out, they were doing some good stuff," says Tompkins. "Now, they're burning up money like crazy and they don't really get too much done. Most all of these organisations grew too big for their own good and the small scrappy organisations are the ones who are really getting things done on the ground."
Cedrus libani
Tompkins derides those who pin their hopes on technological developments in areas such as wind, solar and nuclear as coming from the smart resource management school, saying they fail to understand that this will not address the core issue, which is that capitalism is addicted to growth.

One of the original Painter trees - imported from Asia Minor
"Resource efficiency is the wrong metric," he says. "We should use nature as the measure, using nature's wisdom as a template for our economic systems.
The sign says in ancient times these trees covered the hillsides of the eastern Mediterranean but almost all were cut for ships and building materials.
"Capitalism doesn't function when it starts to contract and we can see that quite clearly right here in the eurozone. It's like pushing a giant monster underwater that's gasping for air. It goes nuts. Capitalism may have all sorts of things that are good, but ultimately it's bad for everyone."
Mahonia bealei
He believes most sustainability practitioners have made the mistake of spending their time creating strategies and projects, without taking the time to gain a deep understanding of how we got into a mess in the first place. As a result, they may end up doing more harm than good.
"As we get sucked more and more into the technosphere, we become less and less capable of understanding it because it becomes a technological milieu that we're in," he warns.
"It's similar to air; we're basically unconscious about the air. What we need is to understand what technologies themselves bring with them when they're introduced into culture.
"If you extinct all the biodiversity and we end up living on a sandheap with a Norwegian rat and some cockroaches, that doesn't have too much logic to it. That would show that our behaviour as a civilization today is to the pathological. But, if you make a systemic analysis, that's exactly where we're going."
A strategic embrace, not a substantive embrace
Tompkins was a friend of Steve Jobs and the two men had many arguments over the years, with the former Apple CEO trying to convince Tompkins that computers were going to save the world, and Tompkins insisting the opposite.
Tompkins recalls the Apple advertising campaign that highlighted the 1,001 great things that the PC was going to give to us and would tell Jobs that these represented a mere 5% of what the computer did while the other 95% was all negative and exacerbating the biodiversity crisis.
"He'd get mad at me when I'd tell him that," says Tompkins.
"He was locked into a view that these technologies were going to bring all these good things. But that's typical of the purveyors of new technology. They're selling their product and their idea, and their prestige, their power and their influence. Their self-esteem is wrapped up in that. It's impossible for them to see it or to admit it, you see? Because, it pulls the rug out from underneath their purpose, especially when it's attached to a moral purpose.
"That's typical of everybody who introduces a new widget into society. They don't tell you the negative side effects that this introduction of this new invention could provoke."
While there has been much talk of the democratisation that the internet has brought, Tompkins points out that while individuals use it largely for their own narrow interests, large corporations are the big winners as they are able to take advantage of it to become ever more powerful.
Boxelder - Acer negundo
Tompkins also warns technology has become omnipresent and describes how he felt coerced into buying a laptop after recognising that he was becoming increasingly marginalised.
Ulmacaea
"I did not want to compromise my engagement so I was forced to use the very technology that is undoing the world," he says. "I have a strategic embrace, not a substantive embrace. The problem is that 99.9% of the people in our own movement love this thing, they think this is going to lead us to the promised land. I have no such pretensions."
Is technology stemming evolution?
Rather than adding to our knowledge, Tompkins argues computers and smartphones represent "deskilling devices; they make us dumber. We're immersed in a system that now requires the use of a cell phone just to get around, just to function and so the logic of that cell phone has been imposed on us.
"The computer is a mechanism for acceleration, it accelerates economic activity and this is eating up the world. It's eating up resources, it's processing, it's manufacturing, it's distributing, it's consuming. That's what the computer's real work does and it does that 24/7, 365 days a year, non-stop just to satisfy our own narrow needs."
Cucumber Magnolia - one of the original Painter trees, thick with lichen.
Tompkins foresees a dark future dominated as he puts it by more ugliness, damaged landscapes, extinct species, extreme poverty, and lack of equity and says humanity faces a stark choice; either to transition now to a different system or face a painful collapse.
"Of course I'd prefer the transition, because a crash will be highly unpredictable," he says. "It could exacerbate something terrible.
"The extinction crisis is the mother of all crises. There will be no society, there will be no economy, there will be no art and culture on a dead planet basically. We've stopped evolution."
Ginkgo biloba - it dwarfs the family home Lachford Hall, named for the town in England from which the family emigrated in 1681.
This trunk is 21 feet in diameter.
Ginko's are the oldest living species of tree - fossil records date back 150 million years.  Think about that.  Genetically the same tree has survived many climate changes and weather extremes.  So why are they dying now?
An article from 2008 published in Urbanhabitats - an electronic journal on the biology of urban areas around the world says that what is described as an ongoing study by the University of Virginia had already found that ozone is causing the demise of native species, allowing for an increase in invasive species.  This certainly deserves followup, but at that time, this is what the researchers had found:

Elevated Ozone Levels May Lead to Strengthened Invasive Species in Urban Forests
by Eric E. Elton

"Without notable advances in the protection of forests against the stresses caused by air pollution and the advance of invasive species, it is likely that dramatic diebacks and species shifts will occur in urban ecosystems. Yet very few scientists have concentrated on both air pollution and nonnative species and how they combine to weaken forest ecosystems. In an effort to delve deeper into this issue, the Department of Environmental Studies at the University of Virginia has undertaken an ongoing study of the effects of ground-level ozone (O3) on mid-Atlantic urban forests. Their preliminary data suggest that some important native species (e.g., Acer rubrum, Liquidambar styraciflua, Celtis occidentalis,Quercus rubra) are less equipped to defend against oxidation reactions generated from elevated ozone levels than common invasive species (e.g., Ailanthus altissima, Morus alba, Paulownia tomentosa)."
Acer saccharum above the spring house
"Ground-level, or tropospheric, ozone is the main constituent of industrial smog; the gas is formed by a chemical reaction of nitrous oxides (nitrogen dioxide, nitric acid, nitrates, nitrous oxide) and volatile organic compounds (benzene, formaldehyde, toluene) in the presence of sunlight."
The spring house was the original source of water for the farm and a refrigerator.  The water was pumped to a cistern above the house, which supplied running water through underground pipes.
"When the stomata of a plant are left open for gas exchange, ozone enters the stoma cavity and oxidizes the mesophyll cell wall, creating increased permeability of the cell wall and making the cell more vulnerable to injury. Oxidation damage in a leaf results in decreased plant performance and growth after repeated exposures. The UVA study has so far focused on leaf injuries caused by ozone damage in native and invasive trees at nine forested sites within three major East Coast cities, Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Maryland, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania."
"Within each city, UVA scientists chose three separate sites on the basis of their relative annual concentration of ground-level ozone, with thresholds set at: low (0–79 ppb), medium (80–99 ppb), and high (100–125+ ppb). In determining these concentration thresholds, the scientists assumed that the low levels would not injure plants, medium levels would injure only ozone-sensitive plants, and high levels would harm all but the most ozone-tolerant plants. They also assumed that high pollution levels would selectively eliminate pollution-intolerant species while augmenting establishment of pollution-tolerant species; and that forests in low-pollution areas would not have experienced this disturbance and would therefore retain native intolerant species, thus reducing the number of invasive plants that were able to establish there."

Figure 2: Nine urban forested sites are used to compare ozone damage along an ozone level scale.
"The study's preliminary results indicate that as ground-level ozone concentrations increase in forest settings, the native flora presence decreases, while the density of invasive species actually increases. One example of this trend shows the density of the common invasive tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) increase in abundance from low sites to high sites, while the native green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) decreases in overall abundance. Early data also suggest that the native species studied have a greater incidence of ozone-induced oxidative injury than the invasive species. Across all sites, the plants at low-ozone-level sites experienced less overall injury than those at high concentration sites."
"Native species are known to be less adaptive to changes in environmental conditions, while invasive species often cope with changes by reallocating resources and out-competing native counterparts. The ruderal nature of most invasives gives them an inherent advantage over those natives that are not able to adapt to phytotoxic gas increases."
That stump is the "old old" maple that died and was X'd out of the brochure.
"It is clear that some plant species exhibit more tolerance to oxidative damage than others (e.g., Prunus serotina is more tolerant than Fraxinus americana), which may be due to the function of leaf chemicals. The most important chemicals in determining the injury a plant will suffer are antioxidant chemicals. Some species produce large amounts of antioxidant chemicals (e.g., ascorbate, glutathione, superoxide-dismutase, peroxidase, polyamines, carotenoids, α-tocopherol), which may decrease initial injury in active oxygen species and reduce the recovery time from injury. I plan to undertake a comparison of the leaf chemicals of congeneric native and invasive plants, as well as those of invasives and natives found in the same wooded locales. Developing an understanding of how leaf chemicals are involved in oxidative injury will illuminate their role in the interplay between air pollution and invasive ecology."
"The EPA is currently considering amendments to national air quality standards for ground level ozone levels in order to address the issue of vegetation damage. Dating back to 1985, European agencies like the United Nations Economics Commission for Europe established the International Co-operative Programme Forests group to prevent another major forest dieback. However, the EPA's proposed work with regard to ground-level ozone and the European resolutions addressing ozone-forest interactions fail to recognize and assess the role of invasive species, as these issues are commonly dealt with separately. The UVA study clearly suggests that increased levels of air pollution lead to increased populations of invasive species—tying the two issues together quite strongly. In order to ensure that our forests persist intact into the future, scientists and regulators must begin to tackle the hazards of air pollution and invasive species in tandem."
NOTE:  The Obama administration refused to allow the EPA to amend AQ standards to protect vegetation from damage.
Figure 3: Prunus serotina showing typical stipple damage due to high levels of ozone exposure. (Photo courtesy of Schaub, M., Jakob, P., Bernhard, L., Innes, J.L., Skelly, J.M., Kräuchi, N. 2002. Ozone injury database.http://www.ozone.wsl.ch. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf
The photo above is from a Swiss ozone research site that has many photos, and details fumigation experiments.  The most recent papers published is from 2003.  It makes me kind of crazy that everyone seems to have pretty much just closed up shop - but then it doesn't seem to take much to make me crazy these days.  I couldn't find any links to the "ongoing" research at the University of Virginia so I wrote to the thesis advisor of the author to see if they just gave up too.  Here is his answer (RATS):

Gail,

Eric successfully defended his dissertation, but, unfortunately, he has not published any of it.  His dissertation is available from UVa, but you should remember that it has not been truly peer-reviewed at this point.

David Carr

Wait here's a cartoon break before the next dying tree story!



The seeds on the maple are turning brown on the tree before falling off.  How viable is that?
It really takes no effort at all to find stories about "new" tree disease epidemics, they are everywhere.  This one is from the UK, about dying oaks.  Their photo of bleeding bark is, unfortuanately, all too familiar.
Caption:  An oak showing symptoms of stem bleeding – dried fluid crusted in bark splits. Photograph: UK Forestry Commission
Acute oak decline disease prompts £1.1m research effort
Project aims to understand distribution and severity of mystery disease causing Britain's oak trees to 'bleed to death'

"A mystery disease causing Britain's oak trees to "bleed to death" has prompted a £1.1m research effort to identify its cause."
"The government-funded project aims to understand the distribution and severity of acute oak decline (AOD), a fast-acting disease that can lead to the death of an oak tree within three to 10 years of infection. AOD, first observed in the 1980s, is affecting several thousand oak trees across East Anglia, the Midlands and south-east England, but scientists do not know what is causing it.
Dr Sandra Denman, lead scientist on the project to identify its cause, said: 'AOD is a serious problem for both of Britain's native oak trees. Oak is our most important native broad-leafed tree species and is iconic to Britain.'"
"Dr John Morgan, head of the Forestry Commission's plant health service, said: 'We are determined to do everything possible to protect our trees. AOD is a complex condition, and this new Defra funding will enable us to better understand the condition and the number and distribution of trees affected.'"
"At a biosecurity summit last week, the environment secretary, Owen Paterson, called for a united front against tree diseases: 'It is clear that it is only by working together that we can do our best to protect our plants and trees,' he said."
"Denman said the causes of AOD were complex, and two of the bacteria that had been isolated were unique to the diseased trees. Her team also found AOD coincided with the oak jewel beetle, Agrilus biguttatus, being found within the trees. She said: 'Thus a key research question is to determine the relationship between the beetle and the bacteria.'"
"Brian Muelaner, an ancient tree adviser at the National Trust, said: 'The disease can be seen on affected trees as a black, tarry-like resin bleeding from the tree bark. The tar forms as the tree floods the infected area with sap to make anaerobic conditions to kill the infection.'"
Research reported in Scientific American that is concerned about invasive mammals reveals, somewhat tangentially, that trees are producing crops of seeds more frequently.  Naturally they blame it on climate change but can't even agree on whether it is temperature increase or temperature swings.  Maybe it's because all the trees are dying from pollution, and when trees are prematurely in decline they throw more energy into reproducing?  Hm?
"The study relied on masting and climate data going back to the 1970s, focusing on masting in New Zealand’s Orongorongo Valley beech trees. Masting used to happen once every six or seven years, Daniel Tompkins, research leader of Landcare Research’s Wildlife Ecology and Management team, says, but in the past decade, the average has been every three or four years."
"Dave Kelly, an ecologist at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, warned against overgeneralizing Tompkins’ findings. Slight changes in temperature—even a gradual increase—are unlikely to affect masting frequency, he argues. Instead, climate change could have an impact by causing more extreme  events,  like extremely hot or cold temperatures, which could lead to more frequent masting in New Zealand—and around the world. 'As long as other parts of the world have plants that use the same cues, [the findings] should be generalizable,” he adds. “I would be surprised if our climate cue mechanism was not found widely outside New Zealand.'"
Trident Maple - Acer buergerianum
Here's a perfect example of extraordinary seed production in this fairly young Trident Maple:
This fabulous sculptural relic is listed in the brochure even though it's been long dead.
The brochure says:  "Osage Orange - Maclura pomifera - Although this tree fell in 1954, it has resisted decay because its hard wood contains a naturally occurring checmical that is toxic to fungi.  Natve to the Ozark Mountains the resilient wood was used by the Osage Indians to make bows.  Female trees bear a yellow-green fruit that resembles a large bumpy orange."

I love the shape so much I made a black and white version:
There's more on osage orange trees here
Ugh.  Beyond the osage orange, you can see a tuliptree with a painfully thin crown.
Worse still, the dignity and grace of this venerable specimen has been ruined by the construction of a "bell house" by a sadly misguided architect.
It looks as constricting as a corset or maybe even that horrible iron mask in Django Unchained.  Visitors are encouraged to amuse themselves pulling on ropes to ring bells.  In fact an entire network of garishly ugly "amusements" have been scattered around the arboretum, which claims on its website that the installation of "Totally Terrific Treehouses" increased visitorship (and presumeably revenue) by 400%.
Because Americans won't go just to, you know, appreciate Nature without some kind of Disneyesque enhancement.
One of the least offensive is this set of oversize chairs.  The scale is deceptive; three people could easily sit side-by-side on the largest, and it's taller than I am.
Pinus strubus
So the tree looks much smaller than it really is.  Looking up, it's too transparent.

A new study - Modeled PM2.5 removal by trees in ten U.S. cities and associated health effects - prompted another round of email inquiries, but in order to follow the exchange we have to backtrack to an earlier message:
From: Wit's End [mailto:witsendnj@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:07 PM
To: Liebhold, Andrew -FS
Subject: Re: insects in the forest

Hi Sandy,

I see from this article that you collaborated on a study:

 
Which says:

"Although the study shows the association between loss of trees and human mortality from cardiovascular and lower respiratory disease, it did not prove a causal link. The reason for the association is yet to be determined."
 
I don't suppose that could be because trees are absorbing (and dying from) ozone which would otherwise be killing people?

The case is growing stronger.

Regards,

Gail
From: "Liebhold, Andrew -FS" <aliebhold@fs.fed.us>
To: Wit's End <witsendnj@yahoo.com> 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: insects in the forest

Bottlebrush buckeye - Aesculus parviflora
Hi Gail – That’s an interesting thought about trees and ozone.  In the case of emerald ash borer, vast numbers of trees are dying in urban and semi-urban areas as a result of this invading insect species. My personal guess is that the dying trees cause substantial level of anxiety among residents in these areas and that the cardiovascular symptoms are related to that anxiety.  I’m certainly not an expert on medical matters but I understand that relationships between anxiety and these sorts of disorders are known to exist. Nevertheless, I would acknowledge that there might be other possibilities too….

-Sandy
 
From: Wit's End [mailto:witsendnj@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 10:23 AM
To: Liebhold, Andrew -FS
Cc: Donovan, Geoffrey H -FS; Nowak, David -FS
Subject: Re: insects in the forest

Sweetgum - Liquidambar styraciflua
Dear Sandy (and Dr. Donovan and Dr. Nowak),

In light of Dr. Nowak's study (link and abstract below), is it possible to say that the reason your study showed more people died prematurely in neighborhoods where trees had been removed is because trees absorb pollution...and not because their presence "relieves stress"?
 
Although Dr. Nowak's study is confined to particulate pollution, it seems that it would be at least as true for ozone.  And perhaps that would pave the way to understanding why so many (all, basically) trees are dying prematurely.

Thanks for any thoughts you may have on this.

Sincerely,

Gail Zawacki
Oldwick, NJ
 

Abstract:  Urban particulate air pollution is a serious health issue. Trees within cities can remove fine particles from the atmosphere and consequently improve air quality and human health. Tree effects on PM2.5 concentrations and human health are modeled for 10 U.S. cities. The total amount of PM2.5 removed annually by trees varied from 4.7 tonnes in Syracuse to 64.5 tonnes in Atlanta, with annual values varying from $1.1 million in Syracuse to $60.1 million in New York City. Most of these values were from the effects of reducing human mortality. Mortality reductions were typically around 1 person yr-1 per city, but were as high as 7.6 people yr-1 in New York City. Average annual percent air quality improvement ranged between 0.05% in San Francisco and 0.24% in Atlanta. Understanding the impact of urban trees on air quality can lead to improved urban forest management strategies to sustain human health in cities.
Magnolia tripetata
From: Donovan, Geoffrey H -FS
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 11:50 AM
To: Wit's End; Liebhold, Andrew -FS
Cc: Nowak, David -FS
Subject: RE: insects in the forest

No. Neither of these studies say anything definitive about the mechanism linking trees to health. We need some experimental work to illuminate this relationship. However, I think that it’s extremely unlikely that there is only one mechanism mediating such a fundamental relationship.
 
From: Nowak, David -FS
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 9:21 AM
To: Donovan, Geoffrey H -FS; Wit's End; Liebhold, Andrew -FS
Subject: RE: insects in the forest

FYI - The PM2.5 paper has mechanistic links in that it links trees to changes in pollutant concentrations and links changes in concentration to human health.  It may not be definitive, but there are mechanistic links or associations (unless I am misunderstanding what you are stating in relation to links)

All the best

Dave

David J. Nowak, Ph.D.
Project Leader
5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF
Syracuse, NY 13215
From: "Donovan, Geoffrey H -FS" <gdonovan@fs.fed.us>
To: "Nowak, David -FS" <dnowak@fs.fed.us>; Wit's End <witsendnj@yahoo.com>; "Liebhold, Andrew -FS" <aliebhold@fs.fed.us>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: insects in the forest

You’re right, there are certainly plausible mechanisms linking trees to better air quality and in turn to better health. However, we don’t know for sure that this is the link, and we certainly don’t know that air quality is the only link. The public-health folks get really hung up on this. I’m a bit more sanguine, but I know what will happen if we say that we understand the mechanism linking trees and health. It’ll involve pitchforks and flaming torches, and it won’t end well for us.
What can I say - scientists are reticent and no doubt for good reason.  And they don't seem to agree with each other.  In this review at Grist, which includes a quote from a coauthor, the link is unequivocally made:
Beech
Study: Trees save at least a life a year in each of 10 major U.S. cities

"Next time you hug a city-dwelling tree, be sure to whisper quiet thanks for the lives it is helping to save."
"Researchers recently calculated that urban forests help save one or more people from dying every year in each of 10 major cities studied."
"Trees growing in cities help clean the air of fine particulate air pollution — soot, smoke, dust, dirt — that can lodge in human lungs and cause health problems. Trees clear 71 tons of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from Atlanta’s air annually. And they suck up enough pollution to save seven or eight lives every year in New York City.
Sweet Birch - Botula lenta
"These are the findings of researchers with the U.S. Forest Service and Davey Institute, published in the journal Environmental Pollution [PDF]. They calculated the health and economic benefits of air-cleansing urban forests in 10 U.S. cities and found that trees save lives, reduce hospital visits, and reduce the number of days taken off work. They do that mainly by sucking pollutants out of the air. Economic benefits, mostly from reduced mortality, ranged from $1.1 million a year in Syracuse, N.Y., to $60.1 million a year in New York City.
Overall, the greatest effect of trees on reducing health impacts of PM2.5 occurred in New York due to its relatively large human population and the trees’ moderately high removal rate and reduction in pollution concentration. The greatest overall removal by trees was in Atlanta due to its relatively high percent tree cover and PM2.5 concentrations."
Paperbark Maple - Acer Griseum from Central China
"And these findings cover only the effects of cleaning up fine particulate pollution. The study didn’t investigate the economic and life-giving benefits of trees sucking up larger soot particles, ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, or other types of air pollution."
“'This research clearly illustrates that America’s urban forests are critical capital investments helping produce clear air and water; reduce energy costs; and, making cities more livable,' Forest Service researcher Michael Rains said in the press release."

"The study comes after some of the researchers’ Forest Service colleagues discovered a correlation between loss of trees and higher human death rates, which they described in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. As we told you last week, the scientists found that the more trees there are in an area, the less likely people there are to die.
In at least one instance, as reported by the BBC in June 2011, it turns out that an invasive bug had been lurking for much longer than assumed, and only recently began to cause signficant damage (the wooly adelgid killing hemlocks in the US is another).
Horse chestnut collections rewrite leaf miner spread
Horse chestnut leaf miners were living on natural stands of trees in Greece a century before they were first described by science, a study shows.
"The discovery was made by researchers who examined many of Europe's historic herbarium collections."
"They say it offers an insight to the history and origins of the tiny moths, which are blighting many of the continent's horse chestnuts."
Japanese Zelkova - Zelkova serrata
"The findings will appear in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment journal.

"'It is a moth that has been the target of a lot of research recently because it has been expanding [its range] so fast - much faster than other kinds of leaf-mining moths,' explained co-author David Lees from the French Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA)."

"The larval form of the Cameraria ohridella moth feed inside the leaves of the white flowering horse chestnut tree (Aesculus hippocastanum), producing characteristic "mines" between the leaves' veins."
The pond is scummy and the water lily leaves look just as bad as leaves on trees.
"The creatures do not kill the tree but infested trees may produce smaller conkers."
"Dr Lees said C. ohridella was spreading its range by about 60km (40 miles) across Europe each year."
Vernal Witchhazel - Hamamelidaceae
"The small but highly invasive moth was first discovered in 1984, and first described by scientists as a genus new to Europe in just 1986. Since then, it has expanded its range across almost all of Europe."
"'We recently marked the first quarter century of this blight on horse chestnuts and it is quite amazing that during this time its origin has remained a mystery," noted Dr Lees, a scientific associate with the Natural History Museum in London.'"
Unbelievable
"'We decided to look at whether specimens of the moth appeared in herbarium collections, so I contacted (co-author) Walter Lack at Berlin Botanic Garden, who had been studying the history of this tree in Europe.'"
"'I asked him whether he had come across any mines in his historic herbarium collection. He wrote straight back and said that he did have some, which had been collected in 1928 in Albania. He said that there were spots on the leaves but he had no idea what they were.'"
"Dr Lees admitted he was very excited when he examined photos of the specimens and saw the outline of a caterpillar mine."
"'That's when we started to look more widely,' he went on. 'I went to Kew Gardens (London) and as I was looking through the herbarium there I found a specimen from 1879 which had mines in it. We just could not believe it.'"
"They also found examples of leaf miners on collections in Paris."
"Dr. Lees said some of samples of leaf mines had been hidden, as the result of proud botanists attempting to disguise blemishes on their prized leaves."
"He also felt there was another reason why the discovery had not been made before: "'Disciplines stick to what they know best so entomologists would not necessarily go to herbariums.'"
"He explained that the tree has been transported from its native Balkan range and planted throughout Europe since the late 16th Century, so mystery had surrounded why the moth had not 'caught up with its dinner sooner'."
"'We know that this moth has been distributing very fast since the last 1980s, ever since it somehow got to Austria,' Dr Lees said."
Tuliptree - Liriodendron tulipifera
"The arrival of roads in areas within the moths' original range played a part, he suggested."
"'The pupae hibernate in the mine (on a leaf), and they are able to be transported in trucks.'"
The tree set back in the center is a Yellow Buckeye - Aesculus flava
"Before this, the distribution was unlikely to have be widespread because the moths were not able fly far enough to extend their range."
Many of its leaves are turning yellow
Did you catch that?  It's now discovered that the moths were found in London and Paris in the 19th century, but it's because of trucks that they have suddenly spread and become such a problem?  Or, maybe their population is expanding suddenly because the trees are weakened from pollution?
From under the Buckeye, the yellowing leaves are backlit like little lanterns.

In the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel. First, competition: secondly, diffidence: thirdly, glory. The first, maketh men invade for gain: the second, for safety: and the third, for reputation. 

~ Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, 1651.
A young Red Horse Chestnut - Aesculus x carnea
We are only about halfway through our walk through the land of the Bitterz so rather than post more tree stories I am going to expound on my latest frustrations (because why not it's my blog, eh?)
Once the mind is open to the distinct probability that humans are rushing willy-nilly into the arms of extinction, a number of questions seem to arise, and the desire to find answers is powerful.  Is there anything we can we do to stop this?  If we can't stop it, what should we do instead?
^lichen^
Once the overwhelming evidence for the inevitability of, at the very least, totally catastrophic results of overpopulation, overshoot, pollution and climate change cannot be denied - in other words, once it is acknowledged that it is already too damn late - the next question often is, When did it become to late - was it always inevitable?  Is it encoded into our DNA to self-destruct?  Is it a law of the universe for intelligent life to cleverly overshoot resources and implode?  Why why why???
A grove of White Oaks - Quercus alba
This is the path down which many - most? - people cannot bear to tread, and the efforts they make to veer away, no matter how absurd, are myriad.  The squirming gyrations to avoid the obvious knows no bounds.
Take this quote that was posted at Nature Bat's Last:

“I believe that imagination is stronger than knowledge. That myth is more potent than history. That dreams are more powerful than facts. That hope always triumphs over experience. That laughter is the only cure for grief. And I believe that love is stronger than death.”
~ Robert Fulghum
I had never heard of Fulghum although it turns out the title of his book "Everything you ever needed to know you learned in Kindergarden" was familiar to me - and the junk intellect it reveals is precisely WHY I never bothered to learn who the author was.  Anyway this was so I could not resist replying:
Okay, now that is one of the most inane, hilariously vacuous things I’ve read in a long time. Even wiki calls that book “trite and saccharine”.

Well, what do you expect from a guy with 4 children and 9 grandchildren…one home in Seattle and one on Crete.

There’s a guy with a low carbon footprint and a love for ecology.
Later after being admonished for that, I added:  Tender and hopeful feelings are great unless they are delusional. Then they lead to stupid and self-destructive and short-sighted behaviors – like trashing the environment and having too many children.
Besides, what Fulghum wrote doesn’t even make any sense! How can imagination be stronger than knowledge…what does that even mean? Ditto for dreams being more powerful than facts – tell that to Mother Nature when climate change goes exponential. Isn’t this blog called Nature Bats Last – NOT “Dreams Bat Last”?? Hope most certainly DOES NOT always triumph over experience…if it did I would be filthy rich and have a yacht, or maybe a house on the lovely island of Crete that I could fly to every few months and have that not even be a bad thing. I could have nine grandchildren and not worry about them starving to death, too!
Love is stronger than death? What kind of ridiculous idea is that? Is it stronger than NTE too??

I’m all for love – I’m all for laughter. It’s DUMBNESS that bothers me and that entire passage is sophomoric, it’s cretinous even. It’s so annoying that now I’m sounding like ulvfugl on a tear.
Speaking of laughter - comic break courtesy of DesdemonaDespair:


Back to Near Term Extinction and how to pretend it's not happening.



Somehow I have managed to squander several days down a particular rabbit hole that began with an innocent enough search for "Richard Dawkins + racist" after I read a comment that he was.  That swiftly turned up his tweet about Elevatorgate, an infamous incident that began with a youtube video posted in 2011.  I saw it at the time and promptly forgot it, but it turns out that the controversy it initiated has played on…and on and on.   I never suspected that there were so many people immersed in atheism, that there are meetings and organizations galore.  I knew there were books - here's an excellent reading list about it - but didn't realize it is so all-consuming to so many people on a daily basis.  In that sense, I can see where the accusation that atheism is a religion arises although obsession might be a better description.
Is this because atheism is supposed to save the world?  Because our foolish tendency to "believe" is a fatal flaw?

One of the most astonishing aspects of the flame war I'm about to describe, which seems hugely disproportionate to the instigation (but that's always the way when it is a stand-in for deeper issues, I guess), is that even though it is being conducted by obviously well-educated people, there is almost never a mention of climate change unless it's used in the context of a sardonic taunt, such as "He probably thinks he'll save the world from climate change by buying an overpriced tote bag made out of a recycled sail."  Just as people who are aware of climate change waste time in squabbling endlessly online with deniers who will never be convinced they are wrong no matter how violent the weather, these people seem to avoid even talking about the subject.  At any rate, they spend so much energy bickering over trivia they can't possibly have much time left over to worry about ecopocalypse.
Swamp White Oak - Quercus bicolor
This schism between factions of the atheist/sceptical/secular community, however you wish to label them, is another ludicrous and discouraging example of the utter futility of any real cooperation between people - certainly anything significant and sustained enough to accomplish real progress.
This kind of oak likes to grow in wet places, like above this stream.  Since it's a native spcies and not mentioned in any records, it was likely already growing when the Painters began planting.
Just as the explosion over feminism which erupted spontaneously and so unexpectedly at the Four Quarters conference demonstrated, some of the very people who claim to be the most rational and reality based are absolutely no more reasonable, empathetic or even intelligent (though they might be more glib) than the unabashed fundamentalists.
Corsican Pine - Pinus nigra.  Subspecies of the Austrian Pine, native to eastern Europe.
This seems to be especially so when it comes to feminism.  The amount of vitriol and intolerance on all sides is so astounding that it's quite possible to read reams and reams of comment threads and never have any idea who has the moral highground and who is perversely wrong.  Maybe they're all at fault - yeah, that's it.  The personal invective is cringe-inducing, the hyperbole is overblown and the jeering and swearing is prodigiously crude - and not only between the feuding sides but there is internecine carnage within the fold of each.  Jeez!
In the wreckage of Elevatorgate, the faction that was ostracized from the main collection of atheism's most influential bloggers, (who are linked under the umbrella Free Thought Blogs) started their own forum, affectionately dubbed the Slyme Pit.  Truthfully though, sometimes it is also funny, which is why I've read far more of the banter than I should have and also there are all sorts of irresistably silly videos and photoshops.  It appears the standard welcome to newcomers is "Fuck You", so be prepared if you decide to join - also please send me a penny every time you see any of the following words:  victimhood privilege harrassment bullying objectification or rape, plus any sort of profanity.  And then I will be rich.
So much of the chaotic rift and turmoil seems to derive from the most petulant resentments of being banned from comments on blogs, ostensibly due to rudeness, personal insults both real and imagined, and some even manufactured by trolls or at least accusations of such.
Sawara False Cypress - Schamaecyperis pisifera
From Japan and barely alive anymore
not even one of the park's tallest, look at the bench underneath
When I lived in California I often was often exasperated by West Coast people, who had a penchant for complaining about the East Coast, which was denigrated for thinking they were superior and mired in class distinctions.  What they failed to see was that people on the West Coast were just as obsessed with status, they simply expressed it differently.  I worked in a post corporate office around the time that everyone started inflecting up at the end of a declarative sentence, which was tremendously annoying.  It caught on like wildfire and I never met a single person who wondered why.  I couldn't help but feel a preference for the unapologetic and blatant snobbery more prevalent on the East Coast than the hypocritical, reverse holier-than-thouism of the West - but that's probably just because it's what I am used to.
More recently, since becoming part of quite a few organizations and protests, I came to the conclusion that the same inescapable preening and petty self-aggrandizement explain the adject failure of the climate change/environmental movements to coalesce long enough to make any sort of impact.
Magnolia sprengeri native to Central China
An anonymous commenter at DOTE described this so concisely, I'll reprint it below:

"The key driver for the behavior of human beings, like all social primates, is status. Greed, aggression, violence, deception are almost always employed in the act of gaining or maintaining status."
"This is because status is the key element of our identity. As Marshall McLuhan pointed out, violence is always a search for identity. It is how a nobody attempts to become a somebody.
Take away somebody's status, and you threaten their identity. You take away all that is solid in their lives. If you have ever been demoted or fired you will know what I mean."

"Whenever two human beings meet, they are always unconsciously picking up clues to the other person's status. This governs how the interaction will proceed."

"Simply, humanity cannot address its problems because to do so would threaten the status of almost everyone in the world, especially those in the West."

"Humans are status junkies, and this is why every political or environmental movement, no matter how well intentioned, sooner or later is deflected from its purpose by status-related feuding, or by status-granting blandishments from the status quo."

"The only hope for humanity is for it to recognise its perilous addiction to status. Unfortunately, if any mainstream thinker were to recognise this, it is very unlikely that he would be given a big, shiny, status-conferring prize."

Below is the pride and joy of the Arboretum, the giant Sequoia.  The description is quoted below:
"Tyler’s giant sequoia is the tallest of its kind in Pennsylvania. Over 150 years old, this giant sequoia was planted by Jacob and Minshall Painter and is the signature tree of the Arboretum." It's pathetic.  You can see right through it all the way to the other side.
Oriental Spruce - Picea orientalis - Native to Asia Minor.
This is over 100 feet tall, another PA State Champion Tree.
One of the original trees planted by the Painter brothers, it is covered with dripping sap and cankers.
The arborists have installed a new, young Oriental Spruce adjacent to the original, dying one, but it is thin.
It already has lichen growing on it, a sign of decline.
Kentucky Coffee Tree - Gymnocladus dioica
The bark of the Kentucky Coffee Tree is falling off.
Cutleaf Norway Maple - Acer platanoides
Heavy lichen growth and damaged foliage mar the Cutleaf Maple.
We have come full circle to the barn that was pictured in the old photo at the top.
Now it is used as an education center and hired out for parties.  Even though it is three stories high, it is small compared to the towering Cypress.
Silhouetted against the grey light their thinness is exposed, and their branches are breaking.
One more pass by the house in the other direction, to take a peek at the library before leaving.
A leaf from the giant ginko lies where it fell, on a hydrangea.
Here there are formal ornamental gardens.
Following is the description from the literature:
"The Painter Library is a small but unique repository of 18th and 19th century manuscripts, letters, documents and books. It was constructed in 1863 by Jacob and Minshall Painter, bachelor brothers who had an unquenchable curiosity about the natural world."
"The high esteem in which they regarded their documents and volumes is evidenced by the unique fireproof vaults on each floor."
"The first floor contains bookcases where a portion of their large collection of books was kept along with a display of 19th century cultural items such as pottery, tinware, and memorabilia. The stove is from the 1860s period, as well as the several pieces of furniture."
"The second floor vault originally contained a categorized collection of loose documents and deeds; textbooks dating back to the late 18th century; books pertaining to the Society of Friends, including the writings of William Penn, George Fox, and other prominent Quakers; State and County Histories; a set of the Colonial Records of Pennsylvania; and other 19th century government publications."
"Most of this material is now housed in the Friends Historical Library of Swarthmore College."
The arborist told me that the hemlocks have the wooly adelgid and are not expected to live.
Under this stand is a large dying rhododendron.
Even so there are some lovely flowers blooming, so with thanks to reader Gatorindo, here's a poem.


Blackberrying 
  ~ Sylvia Plath

Nobody in the lane, and nothing, nothing but blackberries, 
Blackberries on either side, though on the right mainly,
A blackberry alley, going down in hooks, and a sea
Somewhere at the end of it, heaving. Blackberries
Big as the ball of my thumb, and dumb as eyes
Ebon in the hedges, fat
With blue-red juices. These they squander on my fingers.
I had not asked for such a blood sisterhood; they must love me.
They accommodate themselves to my milkbottle, flattening their sides.
Overhead go the choughs in black, cacophonous flocks—
Bits of burnt paper wheeling in a blown sky.
Theirs is the only voice, protesting, protesting.
I do not think the sea will appear at all.
The high, green meadows are glowing, as if lit from within.
I come to one bush of berries so ripe it is a bush of flies,
Hanging their bluegreen bellies and their wing panes in a Chinese screen.
The honey-feast of the berries has stunned them; they believe in heaven. 
One more hook, and the berries and bushes end.
The only thing to come now is the sea.
From between two hills a sudden wind funnels at me, 
Slapping its phantom laundry in my face.
These hills are too green and sweet to have tasted salt.
I follow the sheep path between them. A last hook brings me 
To the hills' northern face, and the face is orange rock 
That looks out on nothing, nothing but a great space 
Of white and pewter lights, and a din like silversmiths 
Beating and beating at an intractable metal.
Not far from Sophie's house, hidden behind the sprawling cement wasteland where the Lowe's and other big-box stores stare ponderously at the ocean of traffic like very our own Easter Island statues, there is a tiny road that was forgotten when the highway was built.  There I found this lovely colonial farmstead surrounded by hay fields.
Across the drive from that broken tree, another that has fallen sometime since it leafed out this spring still lies on the ground, untouched, both of them spectacularly rotted on the inside.
Pennsylvania is such a boggling contradiction of the most exquisitely crafted historic buildings and adjectly squalid developments.  This stone house, built for John Chads, is now owned by the Chadds Ford Historical Society.
The springhouse is across the street.  It first served as the one-room home of the German mason who built both of them over several years' time.
A large stump stands between the two structures.
Another, enormous hollow tree has fallen a bit further along the road.
The proud owner of this fantastic antique told me it was built in 1732.
Just beyond it, another idyllic home with the same tall, narrow shape.
When I came to tiny, obscure Centerville, New Jersey, I stopped to take some pictures.
I stopped because this juncture seems to epitomize the precarious point we teeter upon, staring at the downslope of peak everything - the hopeful solar panels and defiant flag...
The abandoned inn...
A passel of ruined trees.
Oh well, did you know that the denizens of Detroit are deliberately burning it down?  About 5,000 arsons last year, according to their Fire Department.  Of all the obscenely moronic indulgences we engage in that could be mentioned - deforestation, blowing up coral reefs, wars, watching Honey Boo Boo, etc ad infinitum, this one caught my fancy:

Friday, July 12, 2013

Breathing Easy

What a relief to know that climate change and ecosystem collapse are overrated threats.  Enjoy your weekend, peeps.  Maybe by Monday I'll have that loooooong sciency post finished.

 

Thursday, July 11, 2013

On Fire!

The images from the Toronto flood are astounding considering it derived purely from a rainstorm - not a huge hurricane like Sandy, or several rivers overflowing with snow melt.
Meanwhile, although no one puts it together, the country is awash in local news stories about trees falling.
These screenshots are from video in Chicago, a spectacle now becoming so familiar and typical that people are inured to the unprecedented damage being done to houses, cars and power lines.
Reporters scurry from neighborhood to neighborhood, showing the destruction without ever noting that the trees are rotten inside.  No doubt they have no idea air pollution is causing it.
The Landslide Blog has up-to-the-minute video and satellite from the latest disasters in India and China.  Of course the precipitation is heavier now - but logging, development, and widespread decline of vegetation from tropospheric ozone are no doubt playing a role as well.
Meanwhile Las Vegas is roasting within easy sight of a wildfire which "is burning through dead trees and dense pinion pine".
 This morning I got a compliment (I think!) from another commenter over at Nature Bats Last:
The main premise of Guy McPherson's blog is that we are headed for near term extinction (NTE) and so the guest essays and much of the discussion that ensures are generally about how it will transpire, and strategies for coping with such terrible knowledge - often alone.
B9K9 Says: 

Gail, you are absolutely on fire. Out of all the great commenters hanging out in this space, you’re the one who’s artfully linking all the pieces together. Perhaps it’s just my analytical background, but I really appreciate an ability to pull together disparate threads of history/facts in order to build a picture of a cohesive whole.
In fact, your recent run of comments appears to have enough substance to run a blog along similar lines as your ‘friend’ Orlov. You’ve got the perspective on all the key inputs to put out fresh material every 3-4 days. If I make one suggestion, just dump the weepy shit about dying trees & leaves falling and move into top level NTE geo-politics that is already in play.
If you can just make the last leap to embrace the notion that there’s a lot of other people who understand perfectly well what is occurring, and have been busy little beavers setting up the infrastructure to support a legal state in which to preserve control during the coming dark ages, I dare say you’d be a major hit.
The beauty of linking the past with the present (and future) is that it gives you ample topical material in which to publish fresh commentary/observations on the ever increasing & obvious movements afoot.
He wrote that in response to what I wrote earlier:

Gail Says: 
Rob said:
“..but extinction of everything is inevitable given a long enough time-line, therefore, our existance has always been meaningless.”
Refreshingly true – but, most people don’t agree that the extinction of everything is inevitable, because it’s antithetical to their belief that that they possess an eternal soul…or if not that precisely, that some sort of unifying cosmic spirit exists beyond the material world.
That is why NTE is so challenging, because it makes it pretty clear that humans invented consciousness for various evolutionarily beneficial purposes – along with pixies and the tooth fairy and unicorns.
So for those people who are educated enough to understand that indeed, extinction is inevitable for us “special” humans, and quite possibly looming in the near term, there appears to be an endless variety of contortions engaged in to reconcile the two – the existence of some kind of “spirituality” or “consciousness” and the pending lack of any more people to speculate on such anthropogenic notions.
Concurrently there is a powerful urge to blame some external influence for this tragic and ignoble end, because apparently, admitting that we are all complicit also makes it difficult to pretend that humans are special and deserving of something better than the unspeakable maurauding that will surely ensue when the grid goes down and the grocery store shelves are empty.
So Mike K can say:
“Now it may be objected that here and there tribes did develop small localized cultures capable of relatively long term sustainability. This may have transpired, although the truth of those ancient days is largely obscured by the passage of time.”
“Largely obscured” is no doubt true in the sense that far more of the past has been obliterated than has been preserved. However, a remarkable amount has been preserved, and it’s really quite enough for the experts who study it to determine that humans have been “unsustainable” all throughout our history, not merely since the advent of agriculture or capitalism. In fact, recent research has revealed that agriculture emerged independently in several different places in the world, at around the same time. So it’s not some aberrant trait humans could have skipped. It is US, it is who we evolved to be.
Chris Hedges is a great writer and a courageous reporter who a greatly admire, but I would not be the first to observe that he is in the sway of magic too (why else would he be proclaiming a dystopian future on an uninhabitable planet and continue to have children?), which is why Rob’s sentence fits so perfectly with the link:
“The deep healing required to recover from this madness is contained in various spiritual paths…”
It’s absurd (and I mean that in a very affectionate way). The very ability of humans to indulge in fantasy – a genetic ability to lie to ourselves and each other in order to obtain that which makes us fat and happy – is what has led us down the path to perdition. Invoking spirituality to save us from what believing in spirituality has led to is not going to produce the desired results – any more than relying on technology to save us from what technology has produced, which is faster rates of extraction and pollution.
Even the most scientifically illuminated are spell-bound by dream solutions. It’s embargoed till tomorrow watch for the Climate News Network to release their analysis of two studies, which begins with the utterly ludicrous assertion:
“Two separate groups of researchers say there are grounds for hope that the world can escape the prospect of a possibly uncontrollable and very damaging level of climate change. But they agree that world governments will have to meet rigorous conditions to make this happen.”
When I read such nonsense I feel like either I am going insane, or the world is insane; or both. Daniel you raised some provocative questions and that is my answer.
Bob S. – yes that’s the same release I was referring to embargoed yesterday that struck me as total insanity – haven’t they heard of Jevon’s paradox? The world is drifting into such delusion and cognitive dissonance, it would be vastly amusing if only I didn’t care. To be perfectly honest, if I didn’t have children I likely wouldn’t care, or at least not nearly so much. It’s getting harder to laugh when every day there are more disasters – floods and landslides and wildfires – and riots in the streets are getting closer as the agricultural failure looms.
Luna – atheism is not a religion. By any metric you choose to define religion, atheism isn’t. That is sort of like what climate deniers say to environmentalists – if you really wanted clean energy you’d be in favor of nuclear power. A little humor on the subject!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix_cWWVuG1o (and lest anyone feel Bill Maher is offensive, he recently produced a really terrific “climate change for dummies” on HBO Vice called “The World Is Sinking” that is perfect for your Republican brother-in-law, it’s on youtube.)
Like you, I find the universe a vast and mysterious place, so vast and mysterious that I feel no need to imbue it with any more vastly mysterious and wondrous properties than it already physically possesses. If people find they need more than that to get them through the day, or excuse our frequently horrible behavior, it’s certainly a popular choice. But it isn’t based on reality (which I define as testable, empirical scientific facts).
Mike K., I do find many aspects of humanity inspiring and delightful, because I’m human – but “truth, love, giving, beauty, awe” and so forth are not “immaterial” things. Neuroscientists may not know yet precisely how all those human feelings are produced by chemicals or synapses or whatever, but to a growing extent they are finding that they are quantifiable and measurable. People with certain kinds of brain damage or congental defects, for instance, don’t have the same emotional affects depending on which part of the brain is impaired. So there is a source for that, and it is material, not ethereal.
When the last person dies, will there be any more love or awe? Of course not. It will die with the last person, just like Thor died with the last Viking…and so will “spirituality” evaporate, however you prefer to define it for the purposes of living now.
I still kind of think writing about trees dying from pollution has value - for several reasons, the main one being that nobody else is.  I dearly wish someone else would!  Then I could stop and find something more pleasant to do with my remaining days in this life.  I also have a stubborn fondness for the truth, and since the implications of trees dying are huge - for climate, for our food supply, for wildlife - it seems like a worthy subject.  There are so many other catastrophists cataloguing the many paths to ruination, much better than I could.

At least, I'm glad B9K9 confined his description of Wit's End as "weeping" about dying trees, because if he'd said "sniveling" or "whining" that would have been worse, and besides it would have had sexist connotations.  Maybe weeping does too.  B9K9 may be correct that the powers that be are well aware of the imminence of collapse, and are fascistically preparing to survive it by readying the FEMA camps and stocking up on ammunition.  I tend to think they are just as likely to have the denial gene as everyone else but heck, all they'd have to do is watch the video embedded below from the History Channel (which, incredibly, has received only 14,900 views)!

"Prophets of Doom" presents a decent overview of the multitude of converging catastrophes (except trees of course!), well worth the hour and a half to watch, especially for neophytes unfamiliar with the issues.  But I couldn't help being taken aback by the introduction, with the narrator's deep voice intoning ominously that all throughout the history of empires, visionary men have warned of impending collapse and yet been ignored by the public and the leaders of the day.  And then it goes on to interview several men about their vision of apocalyptic collapse.  It was so obviously lacking a female voice that I couldn't help thinking that maybe if I was a man, more people would take seriously the threat to trees - and existence - that is the subject of this blog.  You think?  Should I change my name to William?

Monday, July 8, 2013

Robbins Redux

Bird-cherry Ermine moth caterpillars
Reporter Jim Robbins has written another lament for trees, this time for the UK Guardian - moaning about beetles and fungus and temperatures - without making clear that the worst threat to their survival is air pollution.  This is especially ironic because in it, he refers to David Milarch, and his program to propagate new trees from old champion stock.  As I wrote last December in "No One Knows Where This Will Lead", Mr. Milarch left his nursery in Michigan and went to California seeking trees that were more resistant to tropospheric ozone, because after two decades watching his stock die in the Midwest, he determined that air pollution was killing the trees.

I suppose it should be considered progress that air pollution at least received a mention in his reporting this time - however, Mr. Robbins, Mr. Milarch and the other folks referred to at the Future Trees Trust of Great Britain who are attempting to breed genetic strains of trees that will be resistant to climate change (ha!) are wasting their time if they don't understand that trees cannot survive at the current levels of background ozone.  They should be advocating an immediate and drastic reduction in the emission of precursors instead of blathering on about genetic diversity and resilience.  If they persist in blaming invasive species, and insects, disease and fungus for forest decline, all of which are merely opportunistic pathogens, then their efforts are doomed to fail.

Put it this way - peak oil is not going to save what's left of Earth's forests, if the discovery of "Trillions of dollars of Worth of Oil Found in Australian Outback" is any indication.  We have plenty of coal, gas and oil to burn until every last tree is stone dead.

Here's a comment I left over a year ago to one of his earlier stories:

Jim Robbins in the NY Times says of dying trees: “The common factor has been hotter, drier weather.” …What??? [Trees are dying EVERYWHERE even where there has been no drought.]
In “Why Trees Matter” he inveighs against the usual insects, and drought. Then, to emphasize how wonderful trees are, he wrote something that I see often – and never know whether it should make me laugh or cry:

“Trees are nature’s water filters, capable of cleaning up the most toxic wastes, including explosives, solvents and organic wastes, largely through a dense community of microbes around the tree’s roots that clean water in exchange for nutrients, a process known as phytoremediation. Tree leaves also filter air pollution. A 2008 study by researchers at Columbia University found that more trees in urban neighborhoods correlate with a lower incidence of asthma.”

This sort of sentiment is so nakedly anthropocentric it enrages me, frankly. If somebody knows enough to understand that trees are cleaning up our pollution, wouldn’t it cross their mind, just for a tiny second, to wonder what that does to the tree??

It’s killing them all!  See A Cascade of Consequences.

At a story Mr. Robbins wrote for YaleEnvironment360 in 2010, one prescient commenter said:

"For any appreciable number of MPB to be killed by cold weather, severely cold weather is required. Either hard freezed early or late in the year -- or sustained temperatures of 30 below! I'm sorry, but these type of temperature conditions have never been common in the mountain region where I have lived all my life."

Exactly!  It was established in the 1950's that bark beetles were killing conifers in the hills above Los Angeles because the air pollution had weakened them - and it never got cold very cold there either.

I brought to Mr. Robbins' attention the (you'd think) salient point that tree species other than pines that host bark beetles were dying out west too:

There is a very significant story here that remains largely untold. Ozone weakens trees and encourages insects, disease and fungus to finish them off. This is fact that has been demonstrated in peer-reviewed science, and yet the existential threat that is implicated seems to have made the subject taboo. 
I wrote to Craig Allen and he refused to even consider ozone as a factor, even though beetles and warming only explain some of the declines in the west - not Sudden Aspen Decline, or Sudden Oak Death, or the shrinking of the biomass in Sequoia forests. Not to mention that trees are dying at a monumentally accelerating rate up and down the east coast. 
Nothing would please me more at this point than for a reporter of your caliber to take on this challenging topic and put it front and center before the damage to annual foliage is so rampant as well that we have massive crop failures and famine.

Below is the excerpt about Mr. Milarch, but if you've got the time and haven't read that post, it has a lot more information from the EPA Science Advisory Report about the effects of ozone on vegetation:

A report on National Public Radio, about a nurseryman who is trying to propagate old, hopefully more ozone tolerant trees, makes it all crystal clear when he is asked why:

"SIMON: Mr. Milarch, what brought you into this Archangel Ancient Tree Archive?"

"MILARCH: Well, we've been in the shade tree business in northern Michigan for several generations. And 20 years ago, our trees that we were growing for the cities and nurseries started to die and we didn't know why. Well, after a couple of years and a lot of research, we found out it was due in large part to the decline in air quality. So, we were trying to find an answer of trees that could be stronger, hardier, could take the increase in temperature as well as the increase in toxins in the air."

Almost exactly a year ago, in Anagnorisis, I quoted Milarch from an interview in which he tells of being spoken to by angels:

“The champions are in harm's way. The whole country should
be forested coast to coast with these giant trees, not with the puny, scraggly,
miserable mess we call our forests. We don't realize what we've lost.”

~ David Milarch, Founder and Pres., Champion Tree Project

Maybe Mr. Robbins and the foresters at the Futures Trees Trust believe in angels too, and that's why they don't feel obligated to warn people that the poisons we are spewing from cars, planes, trains, ships, factories and power plants are destroying the entire ecosystem.  Mr. Milarch says that he is breeding "super" trees from ancient specimens because they are survivors and have withstood the test of time, somehow forgetting that in those prior centuries when they were established, the air was clean.

Here's the article from the Guardian:

Trees: our life savers are dying

For centuries we've treated forests poorly. Yet we're only just learning how crucial trees are to our survival
Several years ago a few trees in my 15 acres of pine forest in Montana turned from green to a rusty brown, killed by swarms of bark beetles. Four years later virtually all of my centuries-old forest was dead. It wasn't just the beetles that did in my trees, but much warmer winters here in the Rocky mountains that no longer killed the bugs, allowing them to expand exponentially.
Since then, as a science journalist for the New York Times, I have written many stories about the dying of the trees – and the news is not good. Many forests across the length and breadth of the Rockies have died in the last decade. Most of the mature forests of British Columbia are gone, from a combination of climate and insects.
The bristlecone pines of the US – the most ancient trees in the world, with some more than 4,000 years old – will die in the coming years because of a combination of bark beetles and a fungal disease, enabled by a warmer climate. Tree-ring studies on the bristlecone show that the last 50 years are the warmest half century in the last 3,700 years.
All this is to say that the fungus killing ash trees in Britain is unlikely to be a one-off. Trees across the world are dying. It's not only the changes brought by a warmer world. We've treated the world's trees poorly for centuries, without regard to ecological principles. We've fragmented forests into tiny slivers, and selected out the best genetics again and again with no regard to the fitness of those that remain. Air pollution and soil abuse has taken a toll. And scientists admit trees and forests are poorly studied. "It's embarrassing how little we know," a leading redwood expert told me.
Yet the little that is known indicates trees are essential. They are the planet's heat shield, cooling temperatures beneath them by 10C and blocking cancer-causing ultraviolet rays. They are robust filters of our air and water, and soak up climate-warming carbon dioxide. Forests slow the runoff of rainfall. Many of the world's damaging floods are really caused by deforestation.
These functions are well known. But trees play many other critical roles that we know little about. Katsuhiko Matsunaga, a marine chemist at Hokkaido University in Japan, discovered that as the leaves from trees decompose, humic acid leaches into the ocean and helps fertilise plankton, critical food for many other forms of sea life. Japanese fisherman began an award-winning campaign called Forests Are the Lovers of the Sea, and planted trees along the coasts and rivers that rejuvenated fish and oyster stocks.
Also in Japan, researchers have long studied what they call "forest bathing". Hiking through the forest has been shown to reduce stress chemicals in the body and to increase NK or natural killer cells in the immune system, that fight tumours and viruses. Elsewhere researchers have demonstrated that anxiety, depression and even crime are lower in neighbourhoods with trees in the picture.
Hundreds of different kinds of chemicals are emitted by trees and forests, many beneficial. Taxane from the Pacific yew tree is a powerful anti-cancer drug. Many other tree compounds are proven to be antibacterial, anti-fungal, anti-viral and even to prevent cancer. The active ingredient of aspirin, acetylsalicylic acid, for example, comes from willows. Recommended by doctors to prevent a range of cancers, as well as heart attack and stroke, some believe this chemical in the wild has a medicinal impact on the health of all creatures as it is aerosolised into the air and water, and breathed in and drunk. Yet, it hasn't been researched.
Trees are greatly underused as an eco-technology – "working trees" – to make natural systems, as well as the world's cities and rural areas, more resilient. They are used here in the US to prevent soil erosion and shade crops. In a neat bit of alchemy, trees can be used to clean up the most toxic of wastes, including explosives, solvents and organic wastes, because of a dense community of microbes as thick as a finger around the tree's roots, a process known as phytoremediation.
The question is what to plant to withstand the challenges of a changing world to assure a world with trees. In the UK a group called Future Trees Trust is breeding more resilient trees. And a shade-tree farmer from the US named David Milarch, a co-founder of the Archangel Ancient Tree Archive, and whom I have written about, is making copies of some of the world's oldest and largest trees, from California redwoods to the oaks of Ireland – with proven survivor genetics – to be part of a future forest mix. "These are the supertrees," he says, "and they have stood the test of time."
Before I began this journey I felt planting trees was a feeble response to the planet's problems. No longer. As the proverb asks: "When is the best time to plant a tree?" Twenty years ago. "The second-best time?" Today.

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Marche Funèbre

On Wednesday, an elderly couple (ages 70 and 69) won the lottery, restricted to 20 applicants daily, to hike to the famous rock formation in Arizona called The Wave.  In order to protect the remote site, there is only a 10% chance of gaining access - out of 48,000 people last year, there were 7,300 allowed to make the treck.

The pair were found dead the next day, the wife huddled under one of the few juniper trees.  Naturally, the news article blames the heat, which reached 106 degrees - but, typical for deaths attributed to heat, doesn't mention the level of air pollution.  This is what the AirNow site posted for Wednesday's air quality in Arizona.

The level for ozone is a whopping 97 ppb - a mere 4 ppb shy of shading into the orange zone (101 - 150).  Below are the descriptions of the alert levels and keep in mind, like every other regulatory rule issued by US agencies, they are wholly inadequate to protect human health...and elderly = "sensitive".

Air quality is acceptable; however, for some pollutants there may be a moderate health concern for a very small number of people who are unusually sensitive to air pollution.


Members of sensitive groups may experience health effects. The general public is not likely to be affected.

Health Message: The following groups should reduce prolonged or heavy outdoor exertion: People with heart or lung disease, Children and older adults. Everyone else should limit prolonged or heavy exertion.

Oh well.  Following are part of the comments and links I left this morning at Nature Bats Last, which, considered with the video that follows, explains why it hardly matters that ozone is killing not only people but trees as well:

If you want a really good, simple, gripping video explanation for your denier friends, try "Extreme Weather" from the Australian Broadcasting Commission.  Presuming you can persuade them to even watch it, if they're not rocking back and forth, sniveling with terror and and abject remorse by the end, then you can just count them as some sort of religious fundamentalists who will NEVER get it.

As usual, a commenter brought up the ubiquitous hydra-headed idea that if only it weren't for our culture derived from the ownership of land/growing of crops/corporations/detachment from nature/add your own, we would be able to live sustainably.  This time the proof was in the novel, Ishmael.  Sigh...I tried again:

The basic concept of Ishmael is fiction.

“…that mankind lived for a few million years as hunter gatherer (“leavers”), taking what was actually needed and leaving the rest. The past six thousand years, as agriculturalists, we have become (“takers”), taking everything whether needed or not, and destroying everything that we don’t recognize the need for in the process.”

Hunter-gatherers, contrary to popular belief, were not “leavers”. Typically, tribes went into population and then ecological overshoot, and warred with their neighbors. In fact they warred with their neighbors even when they weren’t in overshoot, raiding for women, just like apes. Hunter-gatherers swiftly drove the most easily obtainable, high protein edible species – megafauna, birds, shellfish – into extinction wherever they migrated with no more thought of what future generations would eat than our contemporary society exhibits.

This is all well-established in archaeological and fossil records, in first-contact historical tracts, and in observations of contemporary tribes who have not changed their ways such as the Yanomami. Most people prefer to think that the human capacity for empathy, cooperation and harmony with nature supersedes our tendency to be violent and greedy. So go ahead, anyone who feels better about it, pretend!

However, for those who take the time to actually read and learn, that vision unfortunately simply isn’t born out in the facts – facts like ancient weaponry, art, skeletons with physical trauma or signs of famine, mass graves, torture, cannibalism, defensive architecture, oral legends of warfare, protective armor and on and on (for instance the ongoing debate about the disappearance of the Neanderthals, whose genetic traces are still found today in Europeans and have recently been traced only to females, meaning – oops – raids and genocide) – really, a wealth of evidence that contradicts the idealized noble savage myth.

Since we are already doomed anyway by overshoot and climate change, it probably no longer matters. But it’s a dangerous fantasy, because it misplaces the cause of overshoot onto an external enemy – capitalism or corporatism or agriculture or stratified society – thus guaranteeing we will never recognize the enemy in the mirror. If we can’t confront the true source of our predicament, we absolutely guarantee we will never overcome it, mired in dreams of our better natures coming to the fore – as is perfectly demonstrated in Kevin Anderson’s otherwise remarkably realistic assessment (interview and links here).  He is the only climate scientist I know of who takes climate change as enough of an emergency and existential threat to openly call for researchers to stop flying in his post, Hypocrites in the air: should climate change academics lead by example? , and so I greatly admire him for that...but yeah, he too adds the hopium at the end.


The difference between the idealized hunter-gatherer lifestyle and capitalism is one of scale. HUGE scale, granted - take a look at this powerpoint presentation!

I received that link in email and below is a response to it that I also received, which I thought everyone would like to see.


"What is obvious to a disembodied observer, is painfully unacceptable to the embodied self with which we customarily identify.  40 years ago, during my visit to India, I ranted about the unfortunate appropriateness of massive nuclear warfare capabilities facing massive human population growth.  One of my Indian friends smiled kindly at me and asked, 'Now that you know God’s plan, what’s your problem?'"

And now to Sam Carana's wonderful video, Cruising for Methane, which he posted at the Arctic News website.  With his choice of music I can only guess at his state of mind as he created it, rather a sort of bemused meloncholy, a detached regret, I tend to imagine.

Friday, July 5, 2013

"The Unquiet Woods"

Another xenophobic article, this time from the Economist with the above title, once again blames the blighted UK forests on invasive species from Europe and beyond.  It's quite comical because at least in this instance it is finally admitted that spores travel across the Channel on the wind, meaning the virulent fungal attacks aren't due, as generally posited, to increased nursery trade and lax regulation.  Of course they still don't understand that pollution is the fundamental cause of tree decline, even though it's amply illustrated in the picture at the top of the story!  A truly staggering variety of trees are spectacularly failing - perhaps no more than here in the US, but the English are rabid gardeners and arborists by long tradition, and more likely to take note than the oblivious consumers that populate this country.  Below is my comment, followed by the text.

The picture illustrating the article is more accurate than the article itself. What actually underlies widespread premature mortality of trees is the toxic emissions from burning fuel.


The biotic pathogens, whether invasive or native fungus, insects and disease, are proliferating primarily because trees have weakened immunity to attacks. This result has been demonstrated in decades of scientific research investigating the damage done when plants absorb tropospheric ozone through their stomates, not to mention of course the poisoned rain and soil.

Here's the text of the article:

IN HIGH summer, it should be possible to wander freely through a stand of mature ash trees. Their rustling green boughs should form a dense canopy, blocking out the sun’s rays and making it hard for nettles and other weeds to grow below. But outside the Norfolk village of Cawston, sunlight is streaming through the wilted and partial canopy of a 20-acre ash wood; and the nettles are chest-high and nasty. Almost every other tree has leafless branches, streaked with necrotic lesions. Many are dead. According to Bagehot’s guide, Steve Scott of the Forestry Commission, “This whole plantation’s completely knackered.”

It is a sickening illustration of how fast ash dieback, C halara fraxinea, is attacking one of Britain’s most elegant, ubiquitous and commercially useful trees. Signs of the fungus, which has already infected and will probably kill over 90% of ash trees in continental Europe, were first noticed in British woods only eight months ago. This sparked an ugly row. Because Chalara was known to advance at around 30km (19 miles) a year, it was thought unlikely to leap the English Channel, which suggested that imported ash stocks—allowed into the country through lax regulation or shoddy customs—were to blame for the infestation.

A remarkable survey of British woods, carried out over a long weekend, put paid to that theory. The Chalara infection, it turned out, was far more advanced and widespread than anyone had imagined, and heavily concentrated on the east coast—all the way from Kent to Aberdeen. The Channel was no defence after all. The deadly spores were being blown across it.

Seven months later, as surging summer temperatures cause the fungus to multiply rapidly, the horrifying scale of the infestation is becoming plain. There is a small hope that unique British races of the species—isolated from continental Europe 8,500 years ago—may prove unusually resistant to the blight. But, if the stand at Cawston is any guide, the outlook for Britain’s 80m ash trees is dreadful, with manifold consequences. A fast-growing hardwood, ash is important for hedging and the fuel-wood and furniture industries. In upland woodlands, it is often the climax species. Losing it from the landscape would be as calamitous as the virtual eradication of Britain’s magnificent elms by another fungal blight, Dutch elm disease, in the 1970s.

Finger-pointing has turned to dismay. Many Britons are deeply attached to their trees—as the Tory-led government learned after it tried unsuccessfully to flog off the state-owned forest estate in 2010. The plan met with furious resistance. “In Britain’s conception of itself,” opined the Times, “the myth of the wooded island looms large. William Shakespeare put his fairies in the forests. It was forestry that sheltered Robin Hood from tyranny. Oaks built our navies, which sailed the globe.”

Such rousing sentiment is not completely ludicrous. Britain’s wet and warm climate makes it an unusually good place for trees to grow. Undisturbed by wars, its parklands house some fine specimens, especially of oaks. Yet, by European standards, Britain’s woods are unexceptional. Only 12% of Britain is covered by trees, around a quarter of the European average.

The forestry industry is small; few British farmers practise the small-scale forestry common in Sweden and Germany. Aside from a handful of ancient ash coppices, whichChalara may be about to see off, little remains of traditional British woodsmanship. The silviculture practised in Britain is essentially German. That British woods turn out, so far as ash dieback is concerned, to be extensions of continental ones is therefore appropriate. It is also consistent with a gripping history of arboreal blights.

The spread of such pests and pathogens is no more natural than a Sitka spruce thicket. It is synonymous with trade, which spreads infections as well as prosperity. Pathogens that are controlled in their natural habitats by co-evolved host species or predators cause havoc elsewhere. That is the case with Dutch elm disease and Chalara, both of which may have originated in Asia.
During the 19th century, as global trade increased exponentially, so did the incidence of tree blights. In the early 20th century, after rich countries instituted biosecurity regimes, the growth rates slowed, and in America, at least until recently, remained fairly linear. But in Europe, around 1960, the infection rate picked up, very likely due to the trade-boosting effect of economic integration. This not only spread diseases around the continent itself. It also made the law-abiding countries of northern Europe, such as Britain, susceptible to the sloppier customs regimes of the continent’s southern fringe.

Written in the trees
Global warming has probably made matters worse. In any event, over the past decade a new blight has been identified in Britain’s woods almost every year, with larch, pines, sweet chestnuts and oaks all affected. A short drive from Cawston, in the grounds of a splendid Jacobean mansion, Blickling Hall, by repute the most haunted house in Britain, 400-year-old oaks are dead and dying. Smudged with sappy lesions and peppered with tiny holes, their trunks show signs of acute oak decline, a syndrome associated with boring beetles and bacteria, but nonetheless mysterious.

There is, inevitably, a political dimension to these arboreal plagues. Eurosceptics are quick to blame them on cumbersome EU regulation, and they have a point. It takes longer for an EU member state to seal its borders to an infected product than it should. But where infections can be carried on the breeze that is no solution. To protect its woods, Britain needs to work far beyond them, by helping to improve border security across the EU.

That was one of the recommendations of a high-level task force, commissioned by Britain’s Eurosceptic environment secretary, Owen Paterson, to report on Britain’s endangered woods. It is also an approach that Britain should adopt more widely in its dealings with the EU, a source of both canker and wealth.

Thursday, July 4, 2013

Snark

Videos like this make me so happy I haz a blog, so I can share them.

Freak Accidents

Recent reader uploads of storm damage at Wunderground attribute tree damage to a microburst, in the first instance:
And a "possible" tornado in this photo, even though these trees are obviously so rotten it wouldn't have taken extraordinary wind to knock them over.
Why are they rotten on the inside?  Simple.  They are all being attacked by pathogens, because they are weak, from absorbing pollution.  I am working on my usual long, rambling post about ecosystem collapse but I had to take a break because today, I am very, very angry about the most recent "freak accident".  First, take a look at two prior recent "freak accidents".  A man camping in Quebec died when a tree fell on his tent on June 26.  Despite the fact that there was a storm at the time, witnesses emphasized that they did not experience a very strong storm and did not expect any trees to fall, let alone several.  I can't embed the video but I urge you to watch it at the link, because that fact comes through very clearly, more so than in the transcript which follows, when you hear them speak.

Storm triggers freak accident at Manitoba campground; Quebec man killed



A 45-year-old Quebec man died early Wednesday morning when a tree fell on his tent at Falcon Beach, RCMP say.
Emergency personnel went to the Beach Campground just before 2 a.m. after the tree fell during the severe storm that hit Manitoba overnight.
The visible damage in the campground is almost unnoticeable with just eight to 10 trees downed, according to conservation officials.
But, in what officials calls a ‘one in a million’ type incident, one of the trees fell on a tent while two people, a husband and wife, were inside.
“We heard this terrible noise.” Said Elsie Loewen of Steinbach, who was camping nearby when a neighbour ran up in a panic.
“And she said ‘ there’s a man trapped. A tree has fallen on the tent and this woman cannot speak English, she’s French, and she said we need help’.”
The tree was too large to budge. Loewen called 911. Emergency crews arrived. After fire crews cut apart the tree in pieces small enough to lift off the Montreal man, he was taken to hospital and pronounced dead; his 44-year-old wife, also from Montreal, was treated for minor injuries.
“I’ve been with the department now for 25 years and I have never experienced this kind of an incident, nor heard of one.” said Geoffrey Smith, a Manitoba Conservation Officer at Falcon Lake District Office.
Environment Canada said its nearest weather office, in Sprague, MB, recording peak gusts overnight of 37 knots or 69 km/h. A meteorologist with the weather office, Natalie Hasell, told Global News that is generally not powerful enough to topple trees, unless they are already weakened or dead. It does not necessarily mean that extreme wind gusts were not present, however, according to Hasell.
Campers told Global News they did not realize a severe storm had passed through.
“And that’s why we were so surprised that this big tree was uprooted like that.” Said camper Gerry Klassen of Steinbach.
Conservation officials said what makes the incident even more unusual is the uprooted tree was young and healthy. But a nearby restaurateur of seven years in Falcon Lake Beach Campground said it’s not the first time he’s seen trees falling there due to powerful wind.
“No, that happens in campgrounds all the time when they don’t maintain them properly. I mean, the trees need to be cut down more.” said Michael Walker, co-owner of Bakery Bistro.
Officials said park and maintenance crews routinely eliminate risk before and all throughout the camping season.

Going back to this spring, a young girl was killed when a branch hit her in a "tragic freak accident" absent any storm at all.

12-year-old Conn. girl killed in tragic freak accident by falling tree branch 

Gabriela Hudak was a student at Hamden Middle School in Hamden, Conn. Teachers remember her as someone who 'always had a smile on her face.'

A small Connecticut town has been struck by tragedy after a 12-year-old girl was killed in a freak accident after a tree branch fell down in her own front yard.

Talented musician Gabriela Hudak was hit on the head on Mar. 29 and taken to hospital - but her injuries were so severe she died three days days later on Apr. 1.

I believe I already posted that a woman was seriously injured by a falling branch in Manhattan's Central Park early last month, only one of several incidents that occurred in the past few years having nothing to do with extreme wind.  Citizens often blame the Parks Department for negligence in pruning.  And this is why I am so very very angry today.  In this latest story, the assertion is once again made that the huge oak tree that fell AND KILLED A YOUNG STUDENT looked healthy.  There is only one reason for this.  The condition of trees - all trees, everywhere - is so degraded that specimens that would have been clearly designated hazardous just a few years ago are now regarded as normal.  The symptoms of trees in decline - cracking, peeling bark, holes, broken branches, thin crowns and damaged foliage - are UBIQUITOUS.

If the scientists and foresters had any brains or decency, they would find this phenomena absolutely remarkable and look for the fundamental explanation - the one environmental factor that all trees share in common - the composition of the atmosphere.  But instead they continue prevaricate and blather on about insects and disease and drought and temperature - variables that are insufficient to explain the utterly universal trend of premature mortality.  They also, if they weren't egomaniacal douchebags incapable of an original thought, might wonder why so many people are dying from falling trees when not so long ago that was so rare as to be virtually unheard of.

I admit, this particular "freak accident" which has left several people hospitalized in critical condition has me particularly upset because the victim who died was a student at UC Santa Cruz - where I went to college, and youngest daughter is now a Ph.D. candidate.  In fact I am steaming with fury.  Here's the article (which also has a video I can't embed) as forwarded by Wit's End reader Michele:

Annais Rittenberg, 21, killed by falling tree in ‘freak accident’ at summer camp as children ate breakfast

Four other adults were treated at hospitals after tree fell at Camp Towanga near Yosemite National Park. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. had recently inspected tree and found nothing wrong.

A LaGuardia High School graduate who loved nature was killed Wednesday when a giant tree fell on her at a Jewish summer camp near Yosemite National Park in California.

Annais Rittenberg, 21, a second-year counselor at Camp Towanga, was crushed by a tree that “spontaneously” toppled over onto a campfire circle outside the dining hall, said a spokesman for the Toulomne County Sheriff’s Department.

“She loved animals, she loved nature and she loved people. This is a girl who loved life,” Rittenberg’s heartbroken mother, Penny Kreitzer, said.

Kreitzer said that when she first heard of the accident, she hoped her daughter was safe. She spent hours calling the camp and a nearby hospital, finally getting through to an official at 1:15 p.m., only to be told the tragic news.



Annais Rittenberg is a student at the University of California in Santa Cruz.

“I asked, ‘Is she all right?’ They said, ‘No she isn’t,’” Kreitzer recalled. “I said, ‘Is she dead?’ They said, ‘Yes, she is.’ This is beyond tragic.”


Camp Executive Director Ken Kramarz said four other female camp counselors were injured, two had to be hospitalized. No children were hurt.

In a letter to parents, Kramarz called Rittenberg “a beloved member of the Camp Tawonga staff.”

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. was responsible for annual inspections of the oak tree because of the nearby power lines, according to The Associated Press. Tuolumne County sheriff’s spokesman Sgt. Jim Oliver said PG&E had inspected the tree and found nothing wrong with it, describing this incident as a “freak accident.”

Kreitzer said this was second year her daughter had been a counselor at the camp. She was in charge of teaching art.


Born in California, Annais lived in New York with her parents, Kreitzer and Mark Rittenberg, for 10 years. She graduated from LaGuardia in 2010 and was a senior at the University of California, Santa Cruz, where she studied environmental conservation and hosted on-air shows for the campus radio station, KZSC.


As a teenager, Annais worked at a wildlife preserve in South Africa, tending to injured animals, and spent time in Soweto teaching kids art.

“I’ve lost a beautiful child through that tree,” Kreitzer said.

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

The New Normal

For some people, catastrophic climate change has already arrived. For the rest, it is on the way.

 

Blog Archive

My Blog List

Search This Blog

Followers

counter