Friday, February 24, 2012

Mother, the Movie - Caring for Seven Billion

All photos are screenshots from the movie

One thing that continually astonishes me is the self-defeating, limited circularity of "progressive" activism.  Perhaps in some cases, greens are just plain greedy.  Certainly there are certain influencial authors, ostensibly absorbed with the mission of preventing the end of the world as we know it - whether it's due to peak oil or the devaluation of the dollar or HAARP among other threats - who are at least as preoccupied with making themselves a tidy profit.  But for others, who by all appearances are more sincere, billing humanity for their insight is sadly misguided inadvertance.
Especially perplexing are those filmmakers, who possess unique skills and talent to exercise brilliant and much-needed techniques of persuasion, and have produced compelling narratives such as the "The Cove" and "Just Do It" (never mind "Avatar") - of course those examples are hardly the only ones.  I can't help wondering, if they are so altruistically motivated to stop tiger poaching or save dolphins or preserve a habitable climate...why are they charging for their movies?  It simply ensures that they preach to a tiny choir.
Here's the latest example I've come across, "Mother - Caring for Seven Billion", which I watched last night.  This is a terrific, exemplary film, not because it is quite capable of presenting a feasible plan that will save us from destroying ourselves (there may be none), but because at a minimum it broaches several interconnected subjects (the usual culprits, listed below) with such stunning cinematography that many people who would otherwise blithely ignore the mortal perils it describes, might actually feel compelled to think about them...if they watch the film.  And recognition is the first step to resolving the enormous conundrums that have arisen through endless exponential growth to now confront our very survival.  This is precisely the sort of emotional and intellectual education we so desperately need, which is conveyed through several fascinating interviews as well.
All the more frustrating then, that there is a charge of $5 to download streaming video online for a 12-hour window, and even more to purchase the dvd...granted, neither are huge investments, but it is no doubt a barrier by which the very audience most important to reach - the young and the poor - is eliminated.
I'm going to embed the trailer, from whence it's possible to pay the fee and watch all of "Mother" on a home computer - or go to the website and follow links to locations and dates for screenings...or order the dvd.  Any of which I definitely recommend.

But first I'd like to propose to the producers:

Solicit whatever funding you would have received from charging viewers.  Instead, submit proposals to more foundations for compensation in lieu of sales; ask for donations instead of fees from those who can afford it; and approach manufacturers of condoms, the pill, and other birth control devices...they stand to sell more product, so why not?
Even better than free, give reluctant teens and young adults and those who are inhibited by a cultural taboo an incentive to watch.  People of child-bearing age in wealthy nations have much else to distract their attention these days, and many others in the developing world are impeded by severe religious inhibitions.  They need to be intrigued to see how the issues presented in the film are of vital interest to their own lives and can directly benefit them, if addressed.
One admittedly imperfect suggestion is, at the very beginning after the opening title, to add a subtitle announcing:

1.  At the intermission half-way through, you can pause the film and click to enter a contest for an all-expenses paid trip to the UN Rio Conference on Sustainable Development in June, for you and a companion - where you can meet with some celebrity or other (which can be updated to other related events after Rio).  Or if you don't want that prize you can donate the equivalent value to a scholarship program.

2.  Watch to the end, and you can sign up to collect your free gift - condoms, or a 3-pack of the morning after pill mailed to you in a plain brown wrapper, plus an instant download of the racy movie "How using birth control can make sex even more fun!" (must be 18 years old).

End (or start and end) with an instant online survey (people love to express their opinions):

Which of these threats (choose one or more) do you think is the root of our problems?
  • Overpopulation
  • Resource Depletion
  • Habitat Destruction
  • Species Extinction
  • Economic Inequality
  • Climate Change
  • Pandemic
  • Gender Inequality
  • Nuclear War
  • Zombies
  • Outerspace Aliens
  • Rick Santorum   [just kidding with these last 3!]
  • Other _______________
Ending of course, with sign up here (click the clicky) to find out more, and be part of the solution.
The film itself is impeccable in its content and style...informative, beautiful, and brutally honest.  The only problem is, more people need to see it.  I hope everyone who reads this will set aside the time - and maybe even write to the producers, to ask them to make it widely available and free to all - info@tiroirafilms.net!

Mother: Caring For 7 Billion from Tiroir A Films on Vimeo.

Tim DeChristopher is Still in Jail

I can only imagine how many bitter minutes must creep slowly by for someone who has been wrongly incarcerated.  Anyone who cares about the future of our planet should take just a few of their precious minutes of freedom to remember the tremendous sacrifice he made to protest blatantly illegal corporate pillaging of Nature.  Tim has made another legal appeal to shorten his sentence.  If that fails, he will remain in custody for another entire year.  It was a great honor for me to be in the audience when he addressed the Pricing Carbon Conference in November, 2011, where I took this photo.

Following is a part of his statement to the Court upon sentencing...the entire text can be found here.  Tim is one of the most astute, and powerful speakers I have ever heard.  Tim articulates the need for a complete system change if anything substantive is to be done to save us from ECOpocalypse, which is why he is such a threat to the corporatocracy, and why they made an example of him - to deter others from emulating his courage.


"...As a native of West Virginia, I have seen from a young age that the exploitation of fossil fuels has always gone hand in hand with the exploitation of local people. In West Virginia, we’ve been extracting coal longer than anyone else. And after 150 years of making other people rich, West Virginia is almost dead last among the states in per capita income, education rates and life expectancy. And it’s not an anomaly. The areas with the richest fossil fuel resources, whether coal in West Virginia and Kentucky, or oil in Louisiana and Mississippi, are the areas with the lowest standards of living. In part, this is a necessity of the industry. The only way to convince someone to blow up their backyard or poison their water is to make sure they are so desperate that they have no other option."

"But it is also the nature of the economic model. Since fossil fuels are a limited resources, whoever controls access to that resource in the beginning gets to set all the terms. They set the terms for their workers, for the local communities, and apparently even for the regulatory agencies. A renewable energy economy is a threat to that model. Since no one can control access to the sun or the wind, the wealth is more likely to flow to whoever does the work of harnessing that energy, and therefore to create a more distributed economic system, which leads to a more distributed political system. It threatens the profits of the handful of corporations for whom the current system works, but our question is which segment of the public are you tasked with protecting. I am here today because I have chosen to protect the people locked out of the system over the profits of the corporations running the system. I say this not because I want your mercy, but because I want you to join me."


Please write to him!  He also likes getting photos so he can see who is writing.  Be sure to put a complete return address or he will not be able to receive your letter.

Tim DeChristopher #16156-081
FCI HERLONG, SATELLITE CAMP
Federal Correctional Institution
PO Box 800
Herlong, CA 96113

You can stay updated at Peaceful Uprising, and donate to his legal defense here.

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Ecopocalypse Now


The enigmatic and ingenious Zorro of environmental activism, FreewayBlogger *, has declared it's time for people to stop driving and I couldn't agree more.  There is a contest on for slogans, with a top prize of $1,000.  You've got until March 15th to submit an entry.  Go to the website if you have an idea, or want to learn how to make and mount your own message!

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

What Part of E*MER*GEN*CY Don't They Understand??

Grrr.  I was hoping to get away from the Heartland nonsense and back to trees dying from pollution - but then I read an article in the Atlantic - which ironically is completely speculative about the authenticity of one of the documents and the veracity of Peter Gleick...while simultaneously criticizing his journalistic ethics (!) - and then, I read that Gavin Schmidt of Real Climate was piling on too and, well, it is just pathetic.  So following are thoughts on the kerfluffle of the released documents, with more pictures of trees in New Hampshire and Massachusetts (thanks Susan!).


This was attributed to Schmidt in comments (2/21@11:28pm) at the NYTimes:

"Schadenfreude is a cheap thrill: fun but ephemeral. Gleick's actions were completely irresponsible and while the information uncovered was interesting (if unsurprising), it in no way justified his actions. There is an integrity required to do science (and talk about it credibly), and he has unfortunately failed this test. The public discusion on this issue will be much the poorer for this - both directly because this event is (yet) another reason not to have a serious discussion, but also indirectly because his voice as an advocate of science, once powerful, has now been diminished".
Was there any evidence that Gleick was feeling schadenfreude?  Never mind.  The more important point is that even prominent climate scientists and activists continue to act as if they are in denial of how serious the problem is...that can be the only explanation for Schmidt and Joe Romm, for instance, to criticize Peter Gleick.  The headlines should be proclaiming the following, though only the Guardian so far that I've seen has even mentioned it:

Civilisation faces 'perfect storm of ecological and social problems'
Abuse of the environment has created an 'absolutely unprecedented' emergency,
say Blue Planet prizewinners

Their report is a warning that the world is dangerously in overshoot.  We have overpopulated, overexploited resources, and overpolluted the one earth we have to the point where it is going to take drastic action to pull back from the abyss of total collapse.  Peter Gleick understands that we are in an unprecedented emergency - of which climate change is only one aspect - and he acted accordingly.
Anybody who doesn't realize that we are fouling our own nest just as fast as we can - is stupid.  Not only are we headed for more ever-intensifying extreme weather catastrophes, including floods, droughts and famine - but the oceans are grotesquely overfished, polluted and acidifying; we have stripped the soils, destroying their productivity by overfertilization; and the air is so filthy from noxious fumes derived from combustion of fuel and industrial processes that trees (and people, and animals and insects) are dying all over the world.

The "experts" and pundits should stop whining about Gleick and wake the hell up.
A comment over at Col. Wamsley's post is perfectly illustrative of the point. The writer is a denier, and yet he pinpoints precisely how in fact he possesses a deeper understanding of reality than the vast majority of climate change activists and scientists.

He quotes a line from the Colonel's letter to Heartland, and then explains with crystal clarity exactly why there will never be the "dramatic action to avert a collapse of civilization" that the Blue Planet recipients advise!
"You are a traitor to your own country. I did not spend 30 years in the military to protect the likes of you."
Why?
Because foreign developing nations are licking their chops at the thought of the US signing onto a global climate treaty because they’ll get enriched from the vast transfer of our wealth to their countries (via schemes like REDD, cap-and-trade, CDM, etc.), and our economy will then be controlled by natural resource management via the UN or some other global supra-national agency. 
The end goal here is to lower the standard of living of the US and to force us (and other developed Western style nations) to use less natural resources so that the rest of the world can use those resources to build up their economies so that at some point in the future, all nations have roughly the same standard of living and per-capita GDP. Unfortunately, in this future scenario should it occur, the US isn’t going to have anywhere as near high as GDP as we do today because it would take the natural resources of over 5 Earth’s to provide everybody on the Earth today with the resources needed to have the same standard of living as we have in the US. Our future US economy will be one of very little resource use and hence, a very basic and simple lifestyle.
Quite right too, a very basic and simple lifestyle, one which could still be worth living...except the author misses another little problem which is that, there aren't enough natural resources remaining on this Earth to support just the U.S., even in a very basic and simple lifestyle - never mind everyone else in the world at our current level of consumption - and pollution.  The jig is up, already - and Mother Nature is coming at us with her pitchfork, mad as hell.


The kitchen table comic says it all:





Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Blue Planet Prize - the absolutely unprecedented emergency

Straying yet again from the topic of this blog (trees dying from air pollution) I feel compelled to remark on the disturbing reports of so many dolphins, almost 200 now, beaching in Wellfleet on Cape Cod.  This charming little town is where my parents spend the warmer half of the year, and to watch news of the dolphins crying in the sand there compelled me to try to learn more about what motivates them to  deliberately commit suicide.  I still don't know the answer to that, but I have found out much else that has startled and saddened me.
S'okay.  We will get our comeuppance.  Eighteen winners of the Blue Planet Prize released a report today
warning humanity that we are in overshoot, face an unprecedented emergency and have no  choice but to
take dramatic action if we are to avert the collapse of civilization.
As with other tragedies relentlessly occurring in Nature, I was ashamed to have been so ignorant for so long about the plight of these mammals of the sea, and their despicable treatment at the hands of their human hunters and owners - not to mention the usual embarrassingly craven stupidity of the audience who buys tickets to laugh at their humiliation and misery.  I suppose much the same can be said for many animals in zoos and the circus.  Our exploitation seems to know no bounds.

I saw an interview with former dolphin trainer Ric O'Barry who, like Jacques Cousteau, had an epiphany and reformed from hunter to a life-long passionate protector of wildlife.  When I googled for more information I came to the movie "Lolita, Slave to Entertainment."  I'm going to post all the sections from youtube about this captive Orca below so you can watch this amazing documentary here on the blog.

My favorite quote is when O'Barry, who has been battling corporations and politicians for decades says, scornfully, "People are under the impression that the National Marine Fisheries Service are there to protect the animals.  The fact is, they are a regulatory agency.  They issue permits."  Now that succinctly expresses exactly the contempt deserved by other government agencies, chief among them, the FDA, USDA and their subsidiary the Forest Service, the Interior Department, and the EPA, who are supposed to be protecting trees and the environment and instead issue rules, regulations and permits...mountains of them - anything but actual protection!

For those so motivated, at the very end is embedded the first segment from The Cove, another documentary, about dolphins.  You can follow it to youtube where links to subsequent episodes are listed on the right.

Also, today by coincidence I saw on Apocadocs that a report was just published by scientists and philosophers asserting that whales, dolphins and porpoise are so intelligent and sophisticated and emotionally empathetic, that they deserve the same rights as humans.  If you watch either one of these movies you will have to agree they are at least as deserving a species, if not far more.  And then maybe add a few other animals as well.













The Cove

Peter Gleick Lost in the Heartless Wasteland

I guess I may as well wade in because the honest truth is, I've always hated it when I don't get invited to the party.  I saw that everybody who has posted the documents released last week has received cease and desist orders from the Heartless Wasteland Institute, and I feel left out, neglected and insignificant!  Hopefully, I can rectify that now.
Heart Healthy Breakfast at the Heartland Denialpalooza Conference
Andy Revkin published a loathsome post this morning excoriating Peter Gleick for being the source of the documents.  Actually what happened is that initially Gleick was the hapless recipient of them from an anonymous source, wanted to check their veracity, and obtained verification before releasing them...but that chronology is being distorted and misrepresented.
Naomi Klein, incognito at the Heartland Conference July, 2011
I left the following comment at Dot Earth, which I stopped reading long ago because Andy Revkin is a self-absorbed prima donna who does more harm than good.  I doubt it will ever see the light of day on his blog, so here it is on mine:

Shame?  Reputation in tatters?  HOGWASH the man has now achieved the stature of Daniel Ellsberg.

Sometimes, there is an evil so monstrous that a piddly deception to obtain information about it is a virtuous and noble act.  There can be no greater evil than promulgating the vicious lie that climate change is not an existential threat to most species on earth including ours, emanating from the combustion of fuel.

Andy I don't normally comment on this vain enterprise, the dot earth climate science ghetto of the disgraced NYTimes (the one who lied about weapons of mass destruction, remember?).

But your analysis of Peter Gleick's courageous act is too egregious to allow it to pass unchallenged.

SHAME ON YOU, AGAIN.
Moi, in a failed attempt to lighten the proceedings of the SICCC
Further reading can be found on Fire Dog Lake, which has a scathing analysis of Revkin's diatribe, where can be found this intriguing comment:

The way this has played out so far:
Whistleblower: Here are documents showing how the evil dirty-energy-industry-funded pricks at Heartland are funding lies and smears directed against climate scientists and intended to poison public opinion.
Heartland and Its Stooges: At least one of the documents is bogus! But we won’t tell you how we know that!
Whistleblower: You’re lying, and here’s how I know: I infiltrated your group to get copies of these documents, all of which are created by your group.
Heartland and Its Stooges: EEEEK! Dirty pool! Why didn’t you play nice and hack our servers like our stooges did to that British university?!

Was Gleick set up in a targeted attempt remove him the pages of Forbes, where possibly some conservatives that aren't completely brain-dead might stray over to one of his columns and rethink their ideological reflex to reject science?
Watts Up With That? checks into the Marriott and winks at me
An early and refreshingly outspoken critic of the Heartland Institute as this controversy unfolded was Col. Gary Wamsley.  He has been posting about their ongoing attempts to intimidate him with endearing indignation here.

And if you missed the story about the Heartland's conference in Washington last July, which I infiltrated in the deceptively inconspicuous and, I thought, non-threatening guise of a cupcake...which, nevertheless resulted in making me - I do believe - the one and only blogger to be evicted and then assigned my very own security detail for the duration, click here.
Okay here they come, drum roll, the links to the leaked documents....


I can haz legal threats now too plzzzzzzz???

Monday, February 20, 2012

Monstrous Monsanto

The snowdrops have been blooming for several days, hastened by the almost complete lack of anything resembling winter.  By happenstance I came across an article I recall having read a couple of years ago, which was published in 2006.  I can't remember if I linked to it earlier or not, but its description of the effects of air pollution on trees is so candid and simple, it surprised me all over again.  More than anything, I was surprised all over again to think that not one of the 33,000 employees - which includes 550 scientists with several hundred research assistants and support staff at 67 sites - of the US Forest Service are saying anything to the public with comparable urgency about the terrifying dimensions of this ongoing catastrophe.
As an aside, even the lame E-HOW internet site answers the question, "What is killing my trees from the top down" this way:  "There are many reasons why trees die from the top down. Problems, including air pollution and drought, can attack a tree, regardless of its species....Pollution from acid rain, ozone and herbicides kills trees in a number of ways.  Ozone interferes with a tree's ability to perform photosynthesis. Acid rain contains pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, that combine with sunlight or water to form acids that leach valuable minerals out of the soil. Too much herbicide can kill plants. Trees affected by air pollution usually die from the top down. Symptoms include thinning foliage and dieback of branches. Eventually, the tree breaks off or blows over, but the dying process can take 10 years or more."  Duh!
But getting back to the article about Bangladesh, the assessment was written by Md. Asadullah Khan, who is described as a "former teacher of physics" and now a columnist for The Daily Star, the major English newspaper from Dhaka.  I'm going to intersperse excerpts from his review with pictures from New Hampshire woods, sent to me by my friend Susan Shamel of the Global Warming Education Network (GWEN.org):
 Depletion of forest cover portends climatic disaster
~ Md. Asadullah Khan
"Unsurprisingly, in Bangladesh trees are being felled for fuel in the households and brick fields and also to meet the growing need of croplands for feeding the burgeoning population. But other than this type of extinction, there is another deadly culprit at work that is slowly denuding the forests of the Sunderbans, Cox's Bazar, Sylhet and in northern parts of Bangladesh much beyond our knowledge."
"The disease called 'the dying forest syndrome' which in the Sunderbans is known as 'top dying disease' strikes selectively but with deadly effect. The onset of the disease starts with the dark green branches hanging limply. Between five weeks and three years later, the branches are tinged yellow and then brown. The weakened tree soon drops its needles and eventually stops growing new ones. It becomes leafless at the top and appears stunted. Finally drought, insects, and parasites finish off the weakened plant."
"In parts of Africa, Europe and most notably in the Sunderbans in Bangladesh, the dying forest syndrome causing death of trees has come up as a big environmental disaster. The epidemic of dying trees which has struck the forest resources of the world appears to be quite mysterious. But the most convincing evidence points to air pollution, specially sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen spewed in the air by the ton from electrical generating stations, industrial boilers, smelting plants and automobiles located thousands of miles away."
"One school of thought points out, by itself sulfur dioxide can sap the vitality of the tree; so can oxides of nitrogen. But the real problem seems to begin when two gases work in combination in the atmosphere. Hurled into the air by tall smokestacks, the substances mix with water vapour to form sulfuric acid and nitric acid known as acid rain and in the presence of sunlight turn into oxidants such as ozone. When these new chemical mixtures fall to earth as snow or rain or float into forests as wind or fog, they can be far more lethal than the ingredients that went into them."
"Acid rain, in the form of dry particles, snow and fog, attacks a tree on all fronts. Airborne pollution settles first on the highest treetops of the forest crown, which acts as a natural windbreak. Acid precipitation filters down to the soil, eats away at the root system and eventually leaches out key nutrients such as calcium and potassium and mobilises toxic metals like aluminum. Once on a leaf or needle, acid rain disrupts the operation of the stomata, the tiny openings that permit a tree to 'breathe.'"
"The process of photosynthesis is thrown off balance, and subtle changes take place in the internal chemistry of the tree that result in discolouration and premature aging. Finally acid rain washes away vital nutrients from the leaves and needles so that the tree slowly starves to death, its respiratory, circulatory and digestive systems being crippled. Much like an AIDS victim whose immune system has broken down, the ailing tree is defenceless against the ravages of nature."
"Experts now say that precipitation these days has become more acidic since the onset of the industrial revolution in the mid 19th century. Measured on a chemical scale of pH from 0 to 14 (most acidic to most alkaline), acid rain is defined as precipitation below 5.6. In most of the industrialised countries of Europe, rainfall now has a pH between 4.5 and 5.5. In some parts of Italy, it has been recorded as low as 2.6 or acidic than table vinegar, which has a pH of about 2.9."
"What makes tracking down the cause of toxic poisoning so frustratingly difficult is the caprice of the wind. Modern smokestacks rising more than 1200ft, may spare the surrounding countryside. But they can emit pollutants high into the air, where they travel along wind-formed "skyways" that can carry them hundreds of miles even beyond the country that produced them. That answers the dilemma of the non-industrialised countries like Bangladesh who are not sinners but have to pay a heavy price for other's faults."
"The dying forest has had a greater importance to the Germans than any other issue. They look at forests as being more important than their own health That leads us to think how much oblivious and unconcerned we are about the depletion of our forest resources through factors like dying forest syndrome or top dying disease in the Sunderbans other than rampant logging by interest groups."
Periodically I perform a search on youtube for videos of dying trees.  More and more are appearing, from all around the world.  People are noticing that trees are imperiled, and they are searching for answers.  Sometimes they speculate the trees are dying due to drought or disease or insects or fungus (even though as is constantly repeated here at Wit's End, ozone exposure makes trees and other plants more vulnerable to all of those secondary, naturally occurring stressors, normally held in check).
There is never a lack of blame for the environmental disaster du jour, whether the Fukushima nuclear plant or the Gulf oil spill.  Unfortunately, quite a few people who have realized trees are in decline prefer to believe that there is a New World Order conspiracy to irradiate the atmosphere from cell phone towers or HAARP, and/or to shower chemicals from airplanes...for purposes ranging from "useless eater" population reduction to ameliorating global warming to unknown.  The latest theory, espoused on the film trailer at the very end of this post, appears to be that Monsanto is using chemtrails to kill all the crops by creating artificial droughts, in order to drive farmers out of business, so they can buy up all the cropland and control the world's food supply.  Okay I grant you, THERE'S a motive!
However, as I point out to such adherents to no avail, there isn't any reason to look further for an explanation of tree death than the polluting emissions we are blatantly and unapologetically putting into the atmosphere, quite openly and constantly, from cars, trucks, airplanes, boats, trains, two-stroke engines like chain saws, lawn mowers, ski-mobiles, snow plows, bulldozers, and escaping fumes from drilling for gas and oil, not to mention all the industrial solvents and agricultural fertilizers and electricity production from coal and biomass burning.
Anyway, just for the record, following are some home-made videos demonstrating the problems that people see, it would seem, everywhere.  I don't imagine anyone but an Ozonista like myself would actually want to watch them all - I simply want to illustrate how widespread forest decline has become that it is being digitally captured, from New Zealand to British Columbia to Virginia to Texas, New Jersey, Florida, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, England and Holland.  In just this batch.

This first one has a sense of humor!




The above is from England, but the scenes could have easily been filmed around Wit's End - whereas the astonishment in the caption mirrors my own, it says...Are these trees just wintering?  This is just a few of the trees which are dying near my home in the East Midlands (although my photos don't reveal the true picture) but the authorities tell me everything is normal for this time of year.  Could it be that Sudden Oak Death and Sycamore Black Spot are not confined to the South West and Wales?  So many species of tree seem to be affected, Leylandi, Larch, Beech, Ash and Willow, as well as the faithful English Oak trees.  The hedges are disappearing too - privet and box which I thought were evergreen are losing their leaves, and elderflower and even hawthorn are dead and covered in yellow algae/lichen. Is the natural fall of leaves in the winter masking something more sinister? Is anyone else worried about the trees in their area?



















The next and another further down are by a fellow who, with the collusion of an attorney, set up a phony "trust" scam, and has managed to convince some townships around Boston that the reason they are losing so many trees is gas leaking underground.



Loggers love to show off their chainsaws, here are a couple:







The following is one of many uploaded by a prolific videographer in British Columbia, who is fond of coarse language, so if you like that sort of thing you can go to YouTube and check out his other forays.







The Monsanto theory (of course, I do think Monsanto is monstrous, I just think the company is probably run by people who are far too stupid and self-centered to plot global domination...I hope...you decide!)

Friday, February 17, 2012

Safe & Sound - Taylor Swift

A while ago in the theater, I saw a preview for "The Hunger Games", a truly creepy movie that will likely become a doomer porn classic.  It's so presciently malevolent that I may not be able to stand to watch it, when it is released next month.  People are fascinated with apocalyptic movies, probably because, deep down, everyone knows that we can't continue plundering and polluting the earth indefinitely.  The feast is just about over, and a grimly implacable waiter is approaching with a very large, expensive, unaffordable tab.
Today when I came across this music video which is, I gather, related to the movie somehow, I was less than surprised, but still shocked, at the scenery where it is set.
The location is somewhere outside Nashville, Tennessee.  Do we see any dead trees?  And where is the understory - the mountain laurel, the dogwood, the ferns?
This is pretty much identical to the desolate woods in New Jersey, where trees are either lying on the ground, standing dead, or broken, and there is little remaining beneath but litter and brown leaves.
It's infinitely bizarre to me that people accept this landscape as the new normal - see the prior post on Wit's End for pictures of how trees are supposed to look, and used to look...before we started remorselessly poisoning them with air pollution.

Enjoy the song!

 

Blog Archive

My Blog List

Search This Blog

Followers

counter